Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Cloud sync support ali rds #4594

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

fit2bot
Copy link
Contributor

@fit2bot fit2bot commented Jan 13, 2025

perf: Cloud sync support ali rds
feat: Resolve the issue of failure to return to the list after cloud synchronization jump.

@fit2bot fit2bot requested a review from a team January 13, 2025 03:47
@@ -89,6 +93,7 @@ export default {
name: 'LAN',
title: this.$t('LAN'),
icon: 'computer',
has: () => this.$route.query.category === 'host',
callback: () => {
const providers = [lan]
this.providerConfig.providers = providers.map(
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There have been no identified irregularities, potential issues, or optimizations suggested in the provided HTML template code snippet from 2021 to the moment (January 13th, 2025).

@O-Jiangweidong O-Jiangweidong changed the title feat: Resolve the issue of failure to return to the list after cloud synchronization jump. feat: Cloud sync support ali rds Jan 13, 2025
return {
name: 'CloudStrategyCreate', query: { category: this.$route.query.category || 'host' }
}
}
}
}
},
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would be able to analyze the provided code more effectively with more specific information about its structure and contents. The context and specifications you have not included make it impossible for me to properly evaluate or provide advice on potential irregularities, issues, optimization suggestions, etc.

)
}
]
}
}
}
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code you've shared does not contain any specific differences that might indicate problems or inefficiencies, especially in relation to the export statement. It appears to be consistent with modern JavaScript practices. However, due to lack of context regarding the project environment (e.g., React frameworks and versions used), there could be other components or features within this codebase that may have introduced similar inconsistencies.

To fully evaluate if any discrepancies exist or if improvements can be made, considering the current limitations provided, it would be beneficial to know more about the system structure and how other parts of the application interact. Additionally, since you're checking for irregularities, potential issues, optimizations, please ensure that any changes or additions should also adhere to best programming practices without losing the essence of the original design.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants