Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Remove redundant OMP switch code #2196

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kanikabansal-juspay
Copy link
Collaborator

Type of Change

  • Bugfix
  • New feature
  • Enhancement
  • Refactoring
  • Dependency updates
  • Documentation
  • CI/CD

Description

  • Removed unnecessary switch-related code following the latest OMP design updates.

Motivation and Context

  • Ensures a cleaner and more maintainable codebase.
  • Keeps the implementation aligned with the latest design

How did you test it?

Locally. After removal of code the switches are working as expected.

Where to test it?

  • INTEG
  • SANDBOX
  • PROD

Checklist

  • I ran npm run re:build
  • I reviewed submitted code
  • I added unit tests for my changes where possible

@kanikabansal-juspay kanikabansal-juspay requested a review from a team as a code owner February 4, 2025 09:42
Copy link

Review changes with  SemanticDiff

@kanikabansal-juspay kanikabansal-juspay self-assigned this Feb 4, 2025
@kanikabansal-juspay kanikabansal-juspay added the C-feature Category: Feature request or enhancement label Feb 4, 2025
@kanikabansal-juspay kanikabansal-juspay added chore chore and removed C-feature Category: Feature request or enhancement labels Feb 4, 2025
@JeevaRamu0104 JeevaRamu0104 added the S-blocked Status: Blocked on something else or other implementation work label Feb 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
chore chore S-blocked Status: Blocked on something else or other implementation work
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants