feat(layout): add support for layout #57
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedDraft detected. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a new layout package for the Kawa Resume project, enhancing the project's modular structure. The changes include creating a new Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Core as @kawafe/core
participant Layout as @kawafe/layout
participant Components as @kawafe/components
User->>Core: Provide userData
Core->>Layout: Select layout
Layout->>Components: Render Image
Components-->>Layout: Return rendered image
Layout-->>Core: Return layout component
Core-->>User: Display resume
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
package.json (1)
Line range hint
23-23: Fix array formatting in lint-staged configuration.The pipeline indicates formatting issues. Please format the array onto a single line.
Apply this diff to fix the formatting:
- "*.{js,ts,vue,jsx,tsx}": ["biome check --write"] + "*.{js,ts,vue,jsx,tsx}": "biome check --write"🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Code Lint
[warning] Formatting issues detected in package.json. Keywords array needs to be formatted into a single line.
[warning] Formatting issues detected in package.json. Keywords and files arrays need to be formatted into single lines.
[warning] Formatting issues detected in package.json. Keywords array needs to be formatted into a single line.
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
packages/layout/src/default/index.tsx (2)
4-10: Enhance the layout structure and styling.The current layout implementation is quite basic. Consider adding proper structure and styling for a resume layout.
Consider this enhanced structure:
const layout: LayoutComponent = ({ userData, theme }: LayoutProps) => { return ( - <div> + <div className="resume-layout" style={{ fontFamily: theme.fontFamily }}> + <header className="resume-header"> + <div className="profile-section"> <Image userData={userData} theme={theme} /> + <div className="profile-info"> + <h1>{userData.profile.name}</h1> + <p>{userData.profile.title}</p> + </div> + </div> + </header> + <main className="resume-content"> + {/* Add sections for experience, education, etc. */} + </main> </div> ); };
12-16: Move author details to configuration.The author email is hardcoded. Consider moving it to a configuration file for better maintainability.
Consider creating a separate config file:
// config.ts export const LAYOUT_CONFIG = { name: 'default', author: { name: '苏向夜', email: '[email protected]' } }; // index.tsx import { LAYOUT_CONFIG } from './config'; export const defaultPreset: LayoutPreset = { ...LAYOUT_CONFIG, layout, };packages/components/image/Image.tsx (1)
10-10: Consider using a more specific linting ignore comment.The current comment ignores key binding checks for click events, but it would be more maintainable to document why key bindings are unnecessary in this specific case.
-// biome-ignore lint/a11y/useKeyWithClickEvents: key bindings are useless here +// biome-ignore lint/a11y/useKeyWithClickEvents: This is a pure presentational image component that doesn't require keyboard interactionpackages/core/src/types.ts (1)
158-169: Consider adding JSDoc documentation for the layout system.The new layout system introduces significant architectural changes. Adding comprehensive JSDoc documentation would help other developers understand:
- The relationship between
LayoutComponent,LayoutPreset, andPresetConfig- Examples of creating custom layouts
- Best practices for layout implementation
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (16)
package.json(1 hunks)packages/components/image/Image.tsx(1 hunks)packages/components/image/Image.types.ts(2 hunks)packages/components/package.json(2 hunks)packages/core/farm.config.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/package.json(1 hunks)packages/core/src/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/render.tsx(1 hunks)packages/core/src/types.ts(1 hunks)packages/layout/.keep(0 hunks)packages/layout/farm.config.ts(1 hunks)packages/layout/package.json(1 hunks)packages/layout/src/default/index.tsx(1 hunks)packages/layout/src/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/layout/tsconfig.json(1 hunks)packages/layout/tsconfig.node.json(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- packages/layout/.keep
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- packages/layout/src/index.ts
- packages/layout/tsconfig.json
- packages/layout/tsconfig.node.json
- packages/layout/package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: Code Lint
package.json
[warning] Formatting issues detected in package.json. Keywords array needs to be formatted into a single line.
[warning] Formatting issues detected in package.json. Keywords and files arrays need to be formatted into single lines.
[warning] Formatting issues detected in package.json. Keywords array needs to be formatted into a single line.
packages/components/package.json
[warning] Formatting issues detected in package.json. Keywords array needs to be formatted into a single line.
packages/core/package.json
[warning] Formatting issues detected in package.json. Keywords and files arrays need to be formatted into single lines.
🪛 GitHub Actions: Build and Test
packages/core/src/render.tsx
[error] Cannot resolve @kawafe/layout dependency. The module either doesn't exist, needs to be installed, or has incorrect alias configuration.
🔇 Additional comments (13)
packages/core/src/index.ts (1)
3-3: LGTM! Clean and standard barrel file export.The new export follows the established pattern and correctly exposes the render functionality.
packages/components/image/Image.types.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-14: LGTM! Clean type definitions with proper theme support.The addition of the theme prop is well-structured and properly typed.
packages/components/image/Image.tsx (1)
13-13: Verify the new userData structure across the codebase.The path change from
userData?.photoUritouserData?.profile?.photoreflects a structural change in the userData object.✅ Verification successful
The userData structure change is correctly implemented
The change from
userData?.photoUritouserData?.profile?.photomatches the UserData interface definition inpackages/core/src/types.ts, and no legacyphotoUrireferences remain in the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining old photoUri references that might need updating # Search for photoUri references echo "Searching for old photoUri references..." rg "photoUri" --type ts --type tsx # Search for profile.photo references to verify consistency echo "Checking profile.photo usage..." rg "profile\.photo" --type ts --type tsxLength of output: 297
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for both old and new patterns echo "Searching for photoUri references..." rg "photoUri" echo -e "\nSearching for profile.photo references..." rg "profile\.photo" echo -e "\nSearching for userData type definitions..." ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ { $$$ }' echo -e "\nSearching for type definitions with photo..." ast-grep --pattern 'type $_ = { $$$ photo $$$ }'Length of output: 9690
packages/core/src/types.ts (2)
158-165: LGTM! Well-structured layout types.The new
LayoutComponenttype andLayoutPresetinterface are well-defined and follow the same pattern asThemePreset, providing good consistency in the API design.
168-169: Verify the impact of making theme required.The change from optional to required theme in
PresetConfigis a breaking change that might affect existing implementations.✅ Verification successful
Making theme required aligns with implementation
The change is justified as the codebase already treats theme as a required property:
- The Layout component requires theme prop in its interface
- The render function assumes theme presence
- No fallback mechanism exists for missing theme
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for existing preset configurations that might be affected # Search for PresetConfig usage echo "Checking PresetConfig implementations..." ast-grep --pattern 'const $var: PresetConfig = { $$$ }' # Search for theme property access echo "Checking theme property access patterns..." rg "preset\.theme" --type ts --type tsxLength of output: 315
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for PresetConfig usage in various forms echo "Checking PresetConfig usage patterns..." ast-grep --pattern 'const $_: PresetConfig = $_' ast-grep --pattern 'implements PresetConfig' ast-grep --pattern 'extends PresetConfig' ast-grep --pattern 'as PresetConfig' # Search for theme property access with proper typescript handling echo "Checking theme property access..." rg "\.theme" --type typescript -A 2 # Search for PresetConfig type annotations echo "Checking PresetConfig type annotations..." rg "PresetConfig" --type typescript -A 2Length of output: 588
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for PresetConfig usage echo "Searching for PresetConfig usage..." rg "PresetConfig" -l # Search for theme property access echo "Searching for theme property access..." rg "\.theme" -A 2 # Search for preset configurations echo "Searching for preset configurations..." rg "preset.*theme" -A 2 # List all TypeScript files for context echo "Listing TypeScript files..." fd "\.(ts|tsx)$"Length of output: 1253
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Examine the render.tsx file for PresetConfig usage echo "Checking render.tsx implementation..." cat packages/core/src/render.tsx # Check if there are any default values or fallbacks for theme echo "Checking for theme-related code in types.ts..." cat packages/core/src/types.tsLength of output: 3873
packages/core/farm.config.ts (2)
5-5: Verify TypeScript declaration file generation with the new entryRoot configuration.The
entryRootconfiguration for thedtsplugin has been set to 'src'. Please ensure this aligns with your TypeScript source files structure.✅ Verification successful
TypeScript declaration file generation configuration is correct ✓
The
entryRoot: 'src'configuration is properly aligned with your TypeScript source files structure, as all.tsand.tsxfiles are correctly located within thesrcdirectory.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify TypeScript source files structure fd -e ts -e tsx . src/Length of output: 116
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check repository structure and locate TypeScript files echo "=== Repository Structure ===" fd -t d . packages/core/ echo -e "\n=== TypeScript Files in Core Package ===" fd -e ts -e tsx . packages/core/ echo -e "\n=== Farm Config Content ===" cat packages/core/farm.config.tsLength of output: 1092
11-14: Verify module format compatibility across dependencies.The shift from CommonJS to ESM format and the change in target environment could impact dependency compatibility.
✅ Verification successful
ESM format is fully compatible with the codebase
The codebase is already using ESM throughout, with proper module configurations in all package.json files and consistent ESM import/export syntax. No compatibility issues detected.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential ESM compatibility issues # Look for CommonJS specific syntax that might cause issues rg -g '*.{js,ts,jsx,tsx}' -e 'require\(' -e 'module\.exports' -e 'exports\.'Length of output: 78
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify repository content and module configurations echo "=== Checking repository files ===" fd . -t f echo -e "\n=== Checking package.json files ===" fd package.json --exec cat {} echo -e "\n=== Checking import/export patterns ===" rg -g '*.{js,ts,jsx,tsx}' -e 'import .* from' -e 'export .*'Length of output: 9562
packages/layout/farm.config.ts (2)
5-5: LGTM! React plugin configuration looks correct.The combination of React plugin with DTS plugin is appropriate for a React library.
16-16: Verify external dependencies list completeness.The external dependencies list includes React and ReactDOM. Consider if any additional peer dependencies should be externalised.
✅ Verification successful
External dependencies list is correctly configured
The current externals list is complete as it includes all necessary runtime dependencies (
reactandreact-dom) while appropriately excluding internal packages and build-time dependencies.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential missing external dependencies # Look for import statements in source files rg -g '*.{ts,tsx}' '^import .+ from' src/Length of output: 88
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check package.json and imports in the layout package echo "=== Package.json contents ===" cat packages/layout/package.json echo -e "\n=== Import statements in TypeScript files ===" rg -g '*.{ts,tsx}' '^import .+ from' packages/layout/Length of output: 1328
packages/core/package.json (1)
19-22: Verify compatibility with updated dependencies.Several dependencies have been updated to newer versions. Please ensure compatibility, particularly with the Farm build system update.
✅ Verification successful
Dependencies are compatible and properly aligned
All packages using @farmfe/core are consistently versioned at ^1.6.6, which is the latest stable release. The package shows a mature versioning pattern with regular maintenance updates.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential breaking changes in Farm # Compare package.json across the repository for version consistency fd package.json -x jq -r '"\(.name): @farmfe/core: \(.devDependencies["@farmfe/core"] // "not found")"'Length of output: 255
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check Farm's releases for breaking changes gh release list --repo farmfe/farm --limit 10 # Check for any open issues mentioning version 1.6.6 gh issue list --repo farmfe/farm --search "1.6.6 in:title,body" --state all --limit 5Length of output: 305
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check npm registry for @farmfe/core details npm view @farmfe/core time --json | jq . npm view @farmfe/core versionLength of output: 10219
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Code Lint
[warning] Formatting issues detected in package.json. Keywords and files arrays need to be formatted into single lines.
package.json (1)
13-13: LGTM! Build script integration looks correct.The layout:build script follows the established pattern for other package builds.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Code Lint
[warning] Formatting issues detected in package.json. Keywords array needs to be formatted into a single line.
[warning] Formatting issues detected in package.json. Keywords and files arrays need to be formatted into single lines.
[warning] Formatting issues detected in package.json. Keywords array needs to be formatted into a single line.
packages/components/package.json (2)
24-25: Verify React v19 compatibility.The upgrade to React v19.0.0 is a major version change that could introduce breaking changes. Please ensure:
- All components are compatible with React v19
- All dependencies support React v19
- The application has been thoroughly tested with the new version
Run the following script to check for potential compatibility issues:
✅ Verification successful
React v19 upgrade appears safe to proceed
The codebase shows good compatibility with React 19 as it:
- Uses modern functional components exclusively
- Contains no deprecated patterns
- Has simple, standard implementations
- Doesn't use any experimental features
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for React v19 compatibility issues in the codebase # Search for React-specific patterns that might need updates echo "Checking for potentially affected React patterns..." rg -l 'useEffect|useState|createRef|forwardRef|memo|lazy|Suspense' # Check for React v19 compatibility in dependencies echo "Checking package.json files for React peer dependencies..." fd 'package.json' -x jq -r 'select(.peerDependencies != null) | select(.peerDependencies.react != null) | "\(.name): React \(.peerDependencies.react)"'Length of output: 622
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for specific React patterns and implementations # Look for class components echo "Checking for class components..." rg "class.*extends.*React\.Component|class.*extends.*Component" -l # Check for specific event handler patterns echo "Checking event handler patterns..." rg "on[A-Z][a-zA-Z]*={" -l # Check for specific hook patterns and implementations echo "Examining hook implementations..." rg "use(Effect|State|Ref|Callback|Context|Memo)\(" -A 2 # Look for concurrent mode specific patterns echo "Checking concurrent mode patterns..." rg "use(Transition|DeferredValue|Id)\(" -lLength of output: 614
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check React patterns with fixed regex echo "Checking for class components..." rg "class.*extends.*Component" -l echo "Checking event handler patterns..." rg "on[A-Z][a-zA-Z]*=\{" -l echo "Examining hook implementations..." rg "const.*=.*use(Effect|State|Ref|Callback|Context|Memo)" -A 2 echo "Checking React 19 specific features..." rg "(use(FormState|Optimistic)|startTransition|experimental)" -l # Check actual component implementations echo "Examining component implementations..." ast-grep --pattern 'function $COMPONENT($PROPS) { $$$ }'Length of output: 700
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Code Lint
[warning] Formatting issues detected in package.json. Keywords array needs to be formatted into a single line.
29-33: Verify dependency version compatibility.The updates to development dependencies include:
- @farmfe/core: ^1.6.6
- @types/react: ^19.0.8
- @types/react-dom: ^19.0.3
- core-js: ^3.40.0
Please ensure these versions are compatible with each other and the project's requirements.
Run the following script to check for any reported issues with these versions:
✅ Verification successful
Dependencies are compatible and up-to-date
All specified dependencies are using their latest stable versions as of January 2025, and their type definitions are properly aligned. The peer dependency requirements are satisfied, and no compatibility issues were detected.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify compatibility of updated dependencies # Check for any known issues or breaking changes echo "Checking npm for known issues..." npm view @farmfe/[email protected] bugs npm view @types/[email protected] bugs npm view @types/[email protected] bugs npm view [email protected] bugsLength of output: 320
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check React version and dependency information echo "Checking React version and dependencies..." cat package.json | jq '.dependencies.react, .dependencies["react-dom"]' echo -e "\nChecking package information..." npm view @farmfe/[email protected] time.modified dependencies peerDependencies npm view @types/[email protected] time.modified dependencies peerDependencies npm view @types/[email protected] time.modified dependencies peerDependencies npm view [email protected] time.modified dependencies peerDependencies echo -e "\nChecking latest versions..." npm view @farmfe/core version npm view @types/react version npm view @types/react-dom version npm view core-js versionLength of output: 1840
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Code Lint
[warning] Formatting issues detected in package.json. Keywords array needs to be formatted into a single line.
| export function render(userData: UserData, preset: PresetConfig) { | ||
| const { layout, theme } = preset; | ||
|
|
||
| const Layout = layout ? layout.layout : defaultPreset.layout; | ||
|
|
||
| return <Layout userData={userData} theme={theme} />; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for invalid layout/theme props.
The render function should validate the layout and theme props before rendering to prevent runtime errors.
Consider this implementation:
export function render(userData: UserData, preset: PresetConfig) {
const { layout, theme } = preset;
+
+ if (!theme) {
+ throw new Error('Theme configuration is required');
+ }
const Layout = layout ? layout.layout : defaultPreset.layout;
+
+ if (!Layout) {
+ throw new Error('Valid layout configuration is required');
+ }
return <Layout userData={userData} theme={theme} />;
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export function render(userData: UserData, preset: PresetConfig) { | |
| const { layout, theme } = preset; | |
| const Layout = layout ? layout.layout : defaultPreset.layout; | |
| return <Layout userData={userData} theme={theme} />; | |
| } | |
| export function render(userData: UserData, preset: PresetConfig) { | |
| const { layout, theme } = preset; | |
| if (!theme) { | |
| throw new Error('Theme configuration is required'); | |
| } | |
| const Layout = layout ? layout.layout : defaultPreset.layout; | |
| if (!Layout) { | |
| throw new Error('Valid layout configuration is required'); | |
| } | |
| return <Layout userData={userData} theme={theme} />; | |
| } |
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Build and Test
[error] Cannot resolve @kawafe/layout dependency. The module either doesn't exist, needs to be installed, or has incorrect alias configuration.
| @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ | |||
| import { defaultPreset } from '@kawafe/layout'; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Add workspace configuration and local package reference
The @kawafe/layout package exists locally but isn't properly linked. To resolve this:
- Add
"workspaces": ["packages/*"]to the root package.json - Add
"@kawafe/layout": "^0.1.0"to the dependencies in packages/core/package.json
🔗 Analysis chain
Resolve the dependency issue with @kawafe/layout.
The build is failing due to an unresolved dependency. Ensure the package is properly published and listed in package.json.
Let's verify the package configuration:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if @kawafe/layout is properly configured
cat package.json | jq '.dependencies["@kawafe/layout"] // .devDependencies["@kawafe/layout"] // "Not found"'
# Check if the package exists in the workspace
fd -t f "package.json" packages/layout
Length of output: 190
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check workspace configuration
cat package.json | jq '.workspaces'
# Check layout package details
cat packages/layout/package.json | jq '{ name: .name, version: .version }'
Length of output: 170
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Build and Test
[error] Cannot resolve @kawafe/layout dependency. The module either doesn't exist, needs to be installed, or has incorrect alias configuration.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Dependencies
Configuration
Performance
These changes improve the project's flexibility, maintainability, and build performance while introducing a new layout system for resume components.