Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(lint): fix lint error of biomejs #59

Closed
wants to merge 32 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

Shabi-x
Copy link
Contributor

@Shabi-x Shabi-x commented Jan 31, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Added documentation components for index, image, list, and resume header
  • Improvements

    • Updated List component with semantic HTML structure
    • Improved list item key generation using unique identifiers
  • Technical Updates

    • Modified .gitignore to exclude specific documentation metadata file

These updates enhance the documentation and component structure with improved semantic markup and metadata management.

dundun003 and others added 30 commits December 11, 2024 17:26
refactor: refactor the structure of kawa-ui&kawa-foundation
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 31, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces changes to several files across the project. The modifications include updating the .gitignore to exclude a specific metadata file, adding new entries to a component metadata JSON file, refactoring the List component to use more semantically correct HTML elements, and removing the onClick handler from the Image component. These changes appear to be part of a broader effort to improve component structure and documentation.

Changes

File Change Summary
.gitignore Added docs/components/_meta.json to ignored files
docs/components/_meta.json Added new array entries: ["index", "image", "list", "resume_header"]
packages/components/image/Image.tsx Removed onClick property from image props
packages/components/list/list.tsx Refactored list component to use <ul> and <li> elements, updated ref type
packages/components/package.json Added a newline at the end of the file

Possibly related PRs

Suggested Reviewers

  • fu050409

Poem

🐰 A rabbit's tale of code so neat,
Components dancing to a semantic beat,
Lists and images, now pristine and bright,
Metadata hidden from version control's sight,
A pull request hopping with digital delight! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 089b640 and 162d00f.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • .gitignore (1 hunks)
  • docs/components/_meta.json (1 hunks)
  • packages/components/image/Image.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/components/list/list.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/components/package.json (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
  • docs/components/_meta.json
  • packages/components/package.json
  • .gitignore
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/components/image/Image.tsx (1)

6-6: LGTM: Removed unused onClick prop

Good cleanup to satisfy the BiomeJS linter by removing the unused onClick prop from destructuring.

packages/components/list/list.tsx (1)

12-12: Excellent improvement: Using semantic list elements

Good refactoring to use proper <ul> and update the ref type accordingly. This improves accessibility and semantic correctness of the HTML structure.

Also applies to: 15-15, 19-19

<div key={index} role="listitem">
{renderItem(item, index)}
</div>
<li key={crypto.randomUUID()}>{renderItem(item, index)}</li>
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Critical: Avoid using randomUUID for list keys

Using crypto.randomUUID() for list keys is problematic because:

  1. It generates new keys on every render, defeating React's reconciliation
  2. crypto.randomUUID() may not be available in all environments
  3. For static lists where items aren't reordered, the index is actually more appropriate

Apply this change:

-            <li key={crypto.randomUUID()}>{renderItem(item, index)}</li>
+            <li key={index}>{renderItem(item, index)}</li>

If you need stable keys for reorderable lists, consider requiring an id field in your data items instead.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
<li key={crypto.randomUUID()}>{renderItem(item, index)}</li>
<li key={index}>{renderItem(item, index)}</li>

@Shabi-x Shabi-x closed this Jan 31, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant