Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Review comments proposal.md from API review #167

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from kfswain January 7, 2025 17:46
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: smarterclayton

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from liu-cong January 7, 2025 17:46
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 7, 2025
@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor Author

@robscott as well

@@ -129,6 +130,7 @@ type InferencePoolSpec struct {
// that should be included in the InferencePool. ModelServers should not
// be with any other Service or InferencePool, that behavior is not supported
// and will result in sub-optimal utilization.
/* REVIEW: This is generally true for all services, but since the ig needs to deal with monitoring, health checking, and changes to membership in the pool (i.e. a member removed from the selector or gracefully shutting down), I think it's more of a distraction than necessary. */
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For clarity: We are referencing the comment above?

I'm just going to remove the second sentence entirely, I don't like how I worded that anyway.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants