Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Memory report ci #32

Merged
merged 63 commits into from
Oct 14, 2024
Merged

Memory report ci #32

merged 63 commits into from
Oct 14, 2024

Conversation

magnmaeh
Copy link
Member

@magnmaeh magnmaeh commented Oct 3, 2024

This PR adds a workflow that comments a PR with the change in memory usage for all the C tests. An example of how it will look can be seen here: #56. From the results of the memory report, it is clear the .bss memory region has been massively increased.

It compares the memory usage of the target branch with the head branch to calculate an increase percentage. In doing so it checks out the target branch and runs an action there. Because of this, the CI fails for this PR because the main branch does have the memory-report action yet. But because it works on #56 I expect it will work if we merge this to main as well.

github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 3, 2024

🤖 Pull request artifacts

empty string

file commit
report.txt 2151340

github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 3, 2024

Memory usage report

Here is an overview of how your pull request impacts the memory usage compared to the main branch:

file commit
report.txt 2e607f1

github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2024
@erlingrj erlingrj linked an issue Oct 3, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@erlingrj
Copy link
Collaborator

erlingrj commented Oct 3, 2024

Thanks for addressing this. Will be a very useful feature! However, now the artefacts are committed directly to the main branch of the repo.

Copy link
Contributor

Coverage after merging memory-report-ci into main will be

35.11%

Coverage Report
FileStmtsBranchesFuncsLinesUncovered Lines
external/nanopb
   pb_common.c0%0%0%0%100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 102, 106, 110, 110, 110, 110, 110, 112, 116, 119, 122, 124, 126, 126, 126, 129–132, 14, 14, 14, 142–144, 15, 150–152, 152, 152, 152, 152, 154, 156, 158, 160–161, 163, 166, 168, 17, 171–172, 172, 172, 177, 18, 181, 184–185, 188, 190–192, 195, 197, 197, 197, 199, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 201, 201, 201, 203, 207, 210, 210, 210, 215, 22, 221, 224, 226, 226, 226, 229, 231, 231, 231–232, 232, 232, 235, 238, 238, 238, 24, 241–242, 246, 248, 248, 248, 25, 250, 254, 26, 260, 263, 265, 265, 265, 267, 269, 269, 269, 27, 272–273, 277, 28, 286–287, 29, 290, 292, 295, 297, 300, 302, 302, 302, 304, 306, 306, 306, 308, 308, 308, 308, 308, 310, 313, 313, 313, 313, 313, 315, 32, 320, 34, 36–41, 44, 46–48, 50–55, 58, 60–63, 65–70, 74, 74, 74, 77–78, 8, 82, 84, 84, 84, 86, 88, 88, 88–89, 89, 89–90, 90, 90, 93, 97
   pb_decode.c0%0%0%0%100, 1000–1001, 1003–1004, 1007, 1007, 1007, 1009, 1009, 1009, 1011, 1011, 1011–1012, 1012, 1012, 1016, 1016, 1016, 1022, 1022, 1022, 1024, 1024, 1024–1025, 1027, 1030, 1030, 1030, 1032, 1032, 1032, 1034, 1038, 1038, 1038, 104, 104, 104, 1042, 1042, 1042, 1042, 1042, 1045, 1045, 1045, 1047, 1047, 1047, 1049, 105, 105, 105, 1050, 1053, 1053, 1053, 1055, 1059, 1059, 1059, 1061, 1063, 1063, 1063–1064, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1069, 1074, 1074, 1074–1076, 108, 108, 108, 1082, 1082, 1082, 1082, 1082, 1084, 1084, 1084, 1089, 1089, 1089, 109, 109, 109, 1090, 1090, 1090, 1092, 1092, 1092, 1095–1097, 1100, 1103, 1103, 1103–1104, 1104, 1104, 1106–1107, 1110, 1110, 1110–1111, 1115, 1115, 1115–1116, 1116, 1116, 1118, 1118, 1118, 1123, 1125, 1125, 1125, 1129, 1129, 1129–1130, 1133, 1133, 1133, 1135, 1135, 1135–1136, 1136, 1136, 1140, 1140, 1140, 1142–1143, 1143, 1143, 1145, 1145, 1145, 115, 115, 115, 1151, 1154, 1158, 1158, 1158, 116, 1160, 1165, 1165, 1165–1166, 1168, 1170, 1170, 1170–1171, 1179, 118, 1182, 1186, 1193, 120, 125, 127, 127, 127–128, 128, 128, 131, 131, 131–132, 132, 132, 1336, 1341, 1346, 1349, 1349, 1349–1350, 1352–1353, 1356, 1359, 1359, 1359–1360, 1362, 1362, 1362–1363, 1365, 1367, 1370, 1377, 1377, 1377–1378, 138, 1382, 1389, 1393, 140, 1400, 1400, 1400–1401, 1405, 1416, 1420, 1422, 1425, 1427, 1427, 1427, 143, 1430, 1430, 1430–1431, 1434, 1434, 1434–1436, 1436, 1436–1438, 1438, 1438–1440, 1440, 1440–1441, 1443, 1443, 1443, 1445, 1445, 1445–1446, 1446, 1446, 1448, 1456, 1456, 1456, 1458, 1458, 1458–1459, 1463, 1463, 1463–1464, 1472, 1472, 1472–1473, 1475, 1479, 1479, 1479–1481, 1481, 1481–1483, 1483, 1483–1485, 1485, 1485–1486, 1488, 1488, 1488, 1490, 1490, 1490–1491, 1491, 1491, 1493, 1497, 1503, 1503, 1503–1504, 1506, 1506, 1506–1507, 1507, 1507, 1509–1510, 1510, 1510–1511, 1511, 1511, 1513, 1513, 1513, 1516, 1516, 1516, 1528, 1528, 1528–1529, 1529, 1529–1530, 1533–1534, 1537, 1541, 1543, 1543, 1543–1544, 1546, 1546, 1546–1547, 1547, 1547, 1550, 1552, 1552, 1552–1553,

@magnmaeh magnmaeh marked this pull request as ready for review October 13, 2024 00:22
@magnmaeh magnmaeh requested a review from erlingrj October 13, 2024 00:22
@magnmaeh
Copy link
Member Author

I think it's ready for review now! See the description on the PR for why the CI job is failing.

Copy link
Collaborator

@erlingrj erlingrj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks great! I think this is going to be very useful! In the future I want to do the report based on compilation targeting our embedded platforms.

@erlingrj erlingrj merged commit 80f2da8 into main Oct 14, 2024
1 of 2 checks passed
@erlingrj erlingrj deleted the memory-report-ci branch October 25, 2024 23:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Produce memory usage reports when compiling tests
2 participants