tests fixed that were failing in latest foundry nightly version #958
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new contract Changes
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
test/solidity/Libraries/LibUtil.sol (2)
63-63: Remove unnecessary empty line.This empty line doesn't serve any purpose and can be removed for better code organization.
Line range hint
40-73: Good architectural approach to handling Foundry test compatibility.The introduction of
LibUtilImplementeris a clean solution to adapt the tests for Foundry compatibility:
- It maintains separation between test infrastructure and production code
- The changes are minimal and focused on the specific issue
- The approach preserves the original test semantics while making them more robust
Consider documenting this pattern in the testing guidelines for future reference.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/solidity/Libraries/LibUtil.sol(3 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)
- GitHub Check: enforce-min-test-coverage
- GitHub Check: run-unit-tests
- GitHub Check: run-unit-tests
- GitHub Check: enforce-min-test-coverage
- GitHub Check: generate-tag
- GitHub Check: analyze
🔇 Additional comments (3)
test/solidity/Libraries/LibUtil.sol (3)
40-44: LGTM! Clean implementation of the test helper contract.The
LibUtilImplementercontract provides a clean way to test revert behavior through a contract call, which is more representative of real-world usage compared to direct library calls. This change aligns with Foundry's testing best practices.
49-49: LGTM! Proper initialization of the test helper.The setup follows the established pattern in the test file, maintaining consistency with other contract initializations.
Also applies to: 54-54
64-64: LGTM! Test modifications maintain the same verification logic.The changes correctly adapt the tests to use the new
LibUtilImplementercontract while preserving the original test assertions and expectations. This modification helps ensure compatibility with the latest Foundry nightly version while maintaining the same test coverage.Also applies to: 73-73
Test Coverage ReportLine Coverage: 78.66% (2238 / 2845 lines) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
test/solidity/Libraries/LibUtil.t.sol (1)
63-64: LGTM! Test modifications align with the new implementer pattern.The tests have been correctly updated to use the implementer contract while maintaining the original test logic.
Consider removing the empty line 63 as it doesn't serve any purpose.
Also applies to: 73-73
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/solidity/Libraries/LibUtil.t.sol(3 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: run-unit-tests
- GitHub Check: enforce-min-test-coverage
🔇 Additional comments (3)
test/solidity/Libraries/LibUtil.t.sol (3)
40-44: LGTM! Good use of the implementer pattern for testing library functions.The introduction of
LibUtilImplementeras a wrapper contract is a good solution for testing library functions in Foundry. This pattern ensures reliable testing of revert functionality through contract calls.
49-49: LGTM! Clean setup implementation.The implementer initialization is properly added to the test setup.
Also applies to: 54-54
Line range hint
40-73: Verify if these changes resolve the Foundry nightly test failures.The implementation looks correct and follows best practices for testing library functions. However, let's verify if these changes resolve the original issue.
✅ Verification successful
Changes appropriately address Foundry nightly test compatibility
The implementer pattern is correctly applied specifically for testing the revert functionality, which is the source of the Foundry nightly test failures. Other LibUtil usages in the codebase don't require similar changes as they don't involve testing revert behavior.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if similar patterns exist in the codebase and if they're working # This helps validate if this is a common pattern used successfully elsewhere # Look for other implementer contracts used for testing echo "Searching for similar implementer patterns in test files..." rg -l "function.*public.*pure.*{.*\..*\(.*\).*}" test/ | grep "\.t\.sol$" # Look for direct library function calls in tests that might need similar fixes echo "Searching for potential direct library calls that might need fixing..." ast-grep --pattern 'function test_$_($_) public { $$$ LibUtil.$_($$$) $$$ }' test/Length of output: 588
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for similar implementer patterns and direct library calls # Look for implementer contracts in test files echo "Searching for implementer patterns..." rg -U "contract \w+Implementer" test/ # Look for direct LibUtil calls in test files echo -e "\nSearching for direct LibUtil calls..." rg "LibUtil\." test/ --type sol # Look for test functions with LibUtil calls echo -e "\nAnalyzing test functions with LibUtil..." ast-grep --pattern 'function test_$_() public { $$$ LibUtil.$_($$$) $$$ }' test/Length of output: 531
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Final verification of LibUtil usage and implementation # Look for direct LibUtil calls (fixed ripgrep command) echo "Searching for direct LibUtil calls..." rg "LibUtil\." test/ # Find and show LibUtil library implementation echo -e "\nLocating LibUtil library..." fd -e sol LibUtil.sol echo -e "\nExamining LibUtil implementation..." if [ -f "src/solidity/Libraries/LibUtil.sol" ]; then cat "src/solidity/Libraries/LibUtil.sol" fiLength of output: 1061
Which Jira task belongs to this PR?
Why did I implement it this way?
Checklist before requesting a review
Checklist for reviewer (DO NOT DEPLOY and contracts BEFORE CHECKING THIS!!!)