test: use ipaserver role from collection if it exists

[richm]

No description provided.

[richm]

[citest]

[richm]

[citest]

[richm]

[citest]

[richm]

[citest]

[richm]

[citest]

[rjeffman]

@richm we plan to migrate all ansible_freeipa releases to a collection in late CY24Q2 in anything but CentOS 8 Stream (which is not supported anymore).

Do you think this change is needed?

On another point of view, a "galaxy role" would be nice to ensure collections are installed (or I'm missing something that already exists and I don't know).

[richm]

@richm we plan to migrate all ansible_freeipa releases to a collection in late CY24Q2 in anything but CentOS 8 Stream (which is not supported anymore).

Do you mean CY25?

There are a few problems with the basic ipa test:

• the legacy role was removed from the latest packages in el9 and el10. So we have to use the FQCN of the role in that case.
• the upstream CI was changed to use BEAKERLIB - so we have to now use some other way to distinguish if we can use the ansible-freeipa rpm package, or install the role directly from github
• the ipaserver installation is failing:

2025-02-04T01:55:42Z DEBUG Name ipaserver.test.local resolved to {UnsafeIPAddress('10.31.9.54'), UnsafeIPAddress('fe80::1044:c6ff:fe29:5d99')}
2025-02-04T01:55:42Z WARNING Invalid IP address fe80::1044:c6ff:fe29:5d99 for ipaserver.test.local: cannot use link-local IP address fe80::1044:c6ff:fe29:5d99

Do you think this change is needed?

Something needs to be changed/fixed - not sure exactly what.

On another point of view, a "galaxy role" would be nice to ensure collections are installed (or I'm missing something that already exists and I don't know).

Not sure what you mean?

[richm]

[citest]

[richm]

[citest]

[richm]

[citest]

[rjeffman]

[citest]

[rjeffman]

[citest]

[rjeffman]

[citest]

[rjeffman]

[citest]