-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 191
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update hotp-verification (fixes #746) #748
Conversation
I'm a fan of separate PRs |
Does it? It had some problems with it during initializing HOTP (hence still WIP). |
@tlaurion I'll need to retest to be sure, but IIRC this failed verification when I tested on a Librem13v4 |
#756 is just CBFS fix for x230-hotp-verification board which was reported not boot |
It boots and builds indeed, but for me it is not able to do the HOTP verification. Doesn't you had the problem? Steps to reproduce:
|
Still not working. |
Just to make sure: you mean, you are experiencing the same, right? |
I found the issue as described here. It is very embarrasing, so let's not talk about it. As soon as it is merged into master of hotp-verification I will update the version and hash here and thus the PR is ready to merge then. |
@alex-nitrokey Just merged |
Builds and runs as intended, initialization and verification works fine. |
Sorry closed by error and reopened. |
looks like we just need to update libremkey-hotp-verification_version to d4adfc58e53e61519adafc3dce2ddf729e7ebc86 (or later; master at 03a198c418a60c54ef3ec67ea8a9a2d29b675b9b currently) and adjust hash accordingly |
@stmc-droid see my comment above, this PR needs updating to fix the issue |
I thought I updated this PR as well, but apparently I did it only in #761 hence the confusion, sorry. |
38ba257 is the corresponding commit which I just forgot to push last week. |
pushed #774 since this seems to have stalled, and wanted something working we can merge to get master back to functional ASAP |
if #761 is ready then correct no need, but the commit/PR message lists two items under 'things still needed' so my understanding was that it was not ready, and why I pushed a separate PR to fix the issue independently. |
Mh, that is strange, aren't they ticked? I ticked them last week or so and they are ticked for me... |
they show as grey checkboxes for me, which contrasts with the green checkmarks used elsewhere on github so it certainly appears they are not completed |
#748 (comment) is ticked both for me as well. Maybe you mean different one? Edit: for the green check marks you need UTF-8 glyph AFAIK |
if that's ticked, then it's just horrible design |
Then it is :D |
Well, at least there are the marks 😂 |
What do you think, shall I make two separate PRs instead?
(will fix #746)