Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[flang][openmp] Changes for invoking scan Op #123254
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
[flang][openmp] Changes for invoking scan Op #123254
Changes from 1 commit
d8e27cd
656a381
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
This file was deleted.
This file was deleted.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it would be good to check that the block argument defined by the
omp.wsloop
operation for the reduction variable is what's eventually passed toomp.scan
. Something like:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated to use the autogenerated checks so these gets checked
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd personally prefer not doing that, because it makes the test easily break for unrelated changes in representation and lowering. But feel free to leave it in if you prefer, I don't feel that strongly about it and there are a few other tests like this in the same directory.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I understand the issue you are pointing to. I have updated the testcase.