Fix/get state update with new storage #85
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
antiyro
approved these changes
Apr 29, 2024
Trantorian1
approved these changes
Apr 29, 2024
notlesh
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 14, 2025
* feat : added test boilerplate * feat : updated sharp prover client and added certificate feature * feat : updated sharp prover client and added certificate feature * feat : added certificates for testing * feat : added tests for proving client and fixed fact calculation logic * fix : linter fixes * feat : revamp code * feat : test fix * refactor : resolved comments #1 * refactor : removed redundant code * fix : lint * refactor : updated code as per comments (0xevolve) * markdown lint fix * feat : resolved comment
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix
get_state_updatePull Request type
What is the current behavior?
What is the new behavior?
Does this introduce a breaking change?
No
Other information