Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

change assertion in test_m3gnet_site_transform #651

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 20, 2024

Conversation

kenko911
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

Change the assertion in test_m3gnet_site_transform to fix the error.

Checklist

  • Google format doc strings added. Check with ruff.
  • Type annotations included. Check with mypy.
  • Tests added for new features/fixes.
  • If applicable, new classes/functions/modules have duecredit @due.dcite decorators to reference relevant papers by DOI (example)

Tip: Install pre-commit hooks to auto-check types and linting before every commit:

pip install -U pre-commit
pre-commit install

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 20, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes enhance type-checking in the test suite for the m3gnet functionality. Specifically, the assertion method in the test_m3gnet_site_transform function has been modified. It now uses isinstance to check for dictionary types, improving robustness by accepting subclasses and aligning with Python best practices, while maintaining the original test functionality.

Changes

Files Change Summary
tests/describers/test_m3gnet.py Updated type-checking in test_m3gnet_site_transform from type(...) == dict to isinstance(..., dict) and changed check from dict to pd.DataFrame.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Test as Test Suite
    participant M3GNet as M3GNet Component

    Test->>M3GNet: Run test_m3gnet_site_transform
    M3GNet->>Test: Return atom_feat_dict
    Test->>Test: Assert isinstance(atom_feat_dict, pd.DataFrame)
    Test->>Test: Test passes if valid
Loading

Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 16b338b and c5b1d33.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/describers/test_m3gnet.py (2 hunks)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
tests/describers/test_m3gnet.py (1)

35-35: Inconsistency in transform_one return type and test assertion

The transform_one method in src/maml/describers/_m3gnet.py does not have a return type of pd.DataFrame, which contradicts the test assertion in tests/describers/test_m3gnet.py. This inconsistency should be addressed to ensure alignment between the implementation and the test expectations.

  • File: src/maml/describers/_m3gnet.py
  • Method: transform_one
Analysis chain

Verify the expected return type of transform_one.

The assertion now checks if atom_feat_dict is a pd.DataFrame, indicating a change in the expected output type from a dictionary to a DataFrame. Ensure that the transform_one method in M3GNetSite has been updated accordingly to return a DataFrame.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the `transform_one` method in `M3GNetSite` returns a DataFrame.

# Test: Search for the `transform_one` method in `M3GNetSite` and check its return type.
ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'class M3GNetSite {
  $$$
  def transform_one($_) -> pd.DataFrame:
    $$$
  $$$  
}'

Length of output: 626


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the return type of the `transform_one` method in the `M3GNetSite` class.

# Search for the `transform_one` method definition and check its return type annotation.
ast-grep --lang python --pattern 'def transform_one($_) -> pd.DataFrame:' --search-inside-class M3GNetSite

Length of output: 347


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for the `transform_one` method and check its return type annotation.

# Search for the `transform_one` method definition in the codebase.
ast-grep --lang python --pattern 'def transform_one($_):' -A 5

Length of output: 64


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Use ripgrep to search for the `transform_one` method across the codebase.

# Search for the `transform_one` method definition in the codebase.
rg 'def transform_one' -A 5

Length of output: 7638

@kenko911 kenko911 merged commit b136f24 into materialsvirtuallab:master Aug 20, 2024
3 of 5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant