Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ghc-srpm-macros: Upgrade to 1.9.2-1 #10788

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: 3.0-dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

durgajagadeesh
Copy link

@durgajagadeesh durgajagadeesh commented Oct 18, 2024

Merge Checklist

All boxes should be checked before merging the PR (just tick any boxes which don't apply to this PR)

  • The toolchain has been rebuilt successfully (or no changes were made to it)
  • The toolchain/worker package manifests are up-to-date
  • Any updated packages successfully build (or no packages were changed)
  • Packages depending on static components modified in this PR (Golang, *-static subpackages, etc.) have had their Release tag incremented.
  • Package tests (%check section) have been verified with RUN_CHECK=y for existing SPEC files, or added to new SPEC files
  • All package sources are available
  • cgmanifest files are up-to-date and sorted (./cgmanifest.json, ./toolkit/scripts/toolchain/cgmanifest.json, .github/workflows/cgmanifest.json)
  • LICENSE-MAP files are up-to-date (./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/data/licenses.json, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSES-MAP.md, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSE-EXCEPTIONS.PHOTON)
  • All source files have up-to-date hashes in the *.signatures.json files
  • sudo make go-tidy-all and sudo make go-test-coverage pass
  • Documentation has been updated to match any changes to the build system
  • Ready to merge

Summary

ghc-srpm-macros: Upgrade to 1.9.2-1

Build/Dependency Information

The PR is a leaf PR which builds alone successfully.

Change Log
Does this affect the toolchain?

NO

Associated issues
  • #xxxx
Links to CVEs
Test Methodology
  • Pipeline build id: xxxx

@durgajagadeesh durgajagadeesh requested a review from a team as a code owner October 18, 2024 13:39
@reubeno reubeno added the specs-extended PR to fix SPECS-EXTENDED label Nov 22, 2024
@mfrw mfrw added the 3.0-dev PRs Destined for AzureLinux 3.0 label Dec 4, 2024
@durgajagadeesh durgajagadeesh marked this pull request as draft January 2, 2025 05:32
@durgajagadeesh durgajagadeesh force-pushed the Topic_apache-commons-lang branch from 3a01fdc to d47df6a Compare January 7, 2025 13:55
@durgajagadeesh durgajagadeesh marked this pull request as ready for review January 7, 2025 14:04
@durgajagadeesh durgajagadeesh requested a review from a team as a code owner January 7, 2025 14:04
@@ -4285,6 +4285,16 @@
}
}
},
{
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does not look like a right entry to have since the Source is not a URL but a macro pointing to a file already bundled.

@Sumynwa
Copy link
Contributor

Sumynwa commented Jan 22, 2025

@durgajagadeesh durgajagadeesh force-pushed the Topic_apache-commons-lang branch from 970c7dc to 06d8f11 Compare January 23, 2025 13:51
@durgajagadeesh
Copy link
Author

durgajagadeesh commented Jan 23, 2025

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3.0-dev PRs Destined for AzureLinux 3.0 Packaging specs-extended PR to fix SPECS-EXTENDED
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants