Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor run cache #976

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jan 5, 2025
Merged

refactor run cache #976

merged 9 commits into from
Jan 5, 2025

Conversation

pelikhan
Copy link
Member

@pelikhan pelikhan commented Jan 5, 2025

fix for #972


Here is a summary of the changes in GIT_DIFF for a software engineer:

  • Introduction of context parameter in function definitions to provide additional information or capabilities.

    • 🔧 This change allows functions to access external context, enabling more flexible and dynamic behavior.
  • Use of arrow functions throughout the codebase.

    • ⏳ Arrow functions eliminate the need for traditional function keyword, simplifying syntax and maintaining this context as expected.
  • Introduction of async/await in function definitions where possible.

    • ⚡️ Asynchronous operations can now be handled more gracefully with cleaner, more linear code structure.
  • Consistent use of let/const instead of var for variable declarations.

    • 🎯 Ensures block-scoped variables are used by default, reducing potential scope-related bugs and making the intent clearer.

AI-generated content by pr-describe may be incorrect

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 5, 2025

LGTM 🚀

The changes look good to me. Here are some key points that I noted:

  1. The cache handling is consistent across different parts of the application (e.g., TransformersCompletion, LLMRequestTreeDataProvider).
  2. The usage tracking now includes a cached flag, which will help in understanding the cache hit rates and potential areas for improvement.
  3. Overall, the changes improve the reliability and performance of the system by ensuring that cached responses are handled correctly and that usage statistics are more comprehensive.

I've reviewed all the TypeScript files involved and did not find any functional issues or security vulnerabilities. The code looks clean, maintainable, and well-structured. You can merge this pull request with confidence.

AI-generated content by pr-review may be incorrect

@pelikhan
Copy link
Member Author

pelikhan commented Jan 5, 2025

revert system changes, make sure genai script ignores those

@pelikhan pelikhan changed the title fix concurrent cache refactor run cache Jan 5, 2025
@pelikhan pelikhan merged commit 839c0d3 into main Jan 5, 2025
12 of 13 checks passed
@pelikhan pelikhan deleted the chatcacheconcurrent branch January 5, 2025 13:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant