Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Priority headers should be set by the application #1725

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 11, 2024

Conversation

valenting
Copy link
Collaborator

Instead of setting the priority headers in neqo, the headers should be provided by the application.

See related https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D201265

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 8, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.96%. Comparing base (43e2588) to head (291f5ff).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1725      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   92.98%   92.96%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         120      120              
  Lines       37399    37396       -3     
==========================================
- Hits        34775    34764      -11     
- Misses       2624     2632       +8     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@larseggert
Copy link
Collaborator

LGTM, but I'd like to see another review, since the related Fx parts are new to me.

Copy link
Collaborator

@KershawChang KershawChang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@larseggert larseggert added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 11, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 869afea Mar 11, 2024
15 of 16 checks passed
@larseggert larseggert deleted the priority-header-client branch March 11, 2024 17:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants