-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 126
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: Log rttvar
in qlog
#2005
fix: Log rttvar
in qlog
#2005
Conversation
Failed Interop TestsQUIC Interop Runner, client vs. server neqo-latest as client
neqo-latest as server
All resultsSucceeded Interop TestsQUIC Interop Runner, client vs. server neqo-latest as client
neqo-latest as server
Unsupported Interop TestsQUIC Interop Runner, client vs. server neqo-latest as client
neqo-latest as server
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2005 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 94.99% 94.99%
=======================================
Files 112 112
Lines 36371 36372 +1
=======================================
+ Hits 34552 34553 +1
Misses 1819 1819 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Benchmark resultsPerformance differences relative to 608c0a7. coalesce_acked_from_zero 1+1 entries: No change in performance detected.time: [193.30 ns 193.73 ns 194.17 ns] change: [-0.7435% -0.2437% +0.1736%] (p = 0.33 > 0.05) coalesce_acked_from_zero 3+1 entries: No change in performance detected.time: [237.05 ns 237.73 ns 238.43 ns] change: [-0.9925% -0.2951% +0.3160%] (p = 0.41 > 0.05) coalesce_acked_from_zero 10+1 entries: No change in performance detected.time: [236.30 ns 237.04 ns 237.92 ns] change: [-0.5894% -0.2239% +0.1316%] (p = 0.25 > 0.05) coalesce_acked_from_zero 1000+1 entries: No change in performance detected.time: [217.05 ns 217.22 ns 217.40 ns] change: [-0.3995% +0.2847% +1.0225%] (p = 0.46 > 0.05) RxStreamOrderer::inbound_frame(): Change within noise threshold.time: [119.91 ms 119.99 ms 120.08 ms] change: [-0.5646% -0.3439% -0.1781%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05) transfer/Run multiple transfers with varying seeds: No change in performance detected.time: [55.995 ms 59.163 ms 62.307 ms] thrpt: [64.198 MiB/s 67.610 MiB/s 71.435 MiB/s] change: time: [-10.578% -3.4847% +3.8872%] (p = 0.36 > 0.05) thrpt: [-3.7418% +3.6105% +11.830%] transfer/Run multiple transfers with the same seed: No change in performance detected.time: [68.304 ms 73.395 ms 78.390 ms] thrpt: [51.027 MiB/s 54.500 MiB/s 58.562 MiB/s] change: time: [-5.8779% +5.0685% +17.802%] (p = 0.39 > 0.05) thrpt: [-15.112% -4.8240% +6.2450%] 1-conn/1-100mb-resp (aka. Download)/client: No change in performance detected.time: [274.45 ms 288.46 ms 299.04 ms] thrpt: [334.41 MiB/s 346.67 MiB/s 364.37 MiB/s] change: time: [-7.1290% -2.3989% +1.9128%] (p = 0.39 > 0.05) thrpt: [-1.8769% +2.4579% +7.6762%] 1-conn/10_000-parallel-1b-resp (aka. RPS)/client: No change in performance detected.time: [411.80 ms 415.18 ms 418.61 ms] thrpt: [23.888 Kelem/s 24.086 Kelem/s 24.284 Kelem/s] change: time: [-1.2585% -0.1799% +0.9976%] (p = 0.75 > 0.05) thrpt: [-0.9877% +0.1803% +1.2745%] 1-conn/1-1b-resp (aka. HPS)/client: No change in performance detected.time: [67.797 ms 68.052 ms 68.356 ms] thrpt: [14.629 elem/s 14.695 elem/s 14.750 elem/s] change: time: [-1.3208% -0.6245% +0.1168%] (p = 0.09 > 0.05) thrpt: [-0.1167% +0.6284% +1.3384%] Client/server transfer resultsTransfer of 33554432 bytes over loopback.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Otherwise looks good to me.
; all following rtt fields are expressed in ms
https://quicwg.org/qlog/draft-ietf-quic-qlog-quic-events.html#name-metrics_updated
Slightly related note, why is qlog not using SI units?
Co-authored-by: Max Inden <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Lars Eggert <[email protected]>
This reverts commit cf986bb. `as_millis_f32` is nightly experimental.
Are there other qlog probes we are missing? |
I assume most missing ones are tracked in #528 @larseggert. |
No description provided.