-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add Evaluation of legacy projects Final Paper #3
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
my feedback on your work
@@ -0,0 +1,244 @@ | |||
# **Evaluation of legacy projects to align with current business goals** | |||
|
|||
_Author: Ravil Nurgaliev, Innopolis University 👤_ _Year: 2024_ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Missing Abstract section!
Abstract: A brief summary of the entire paper, including the research question, methods, results, and conclusions. It helps readers quickly understand the paper's purpose and key findings.
# **Evaluation of legacy projects to align with current business goals** | ||
|
||
_Author: Ravil Nurgaliev, Innopolis University 👤_ _Year: 2024_ | ||
# Introduction 📖 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
common!
you entered the subsection directly without any introductory text?
|
||
## Motivation | ||
It is necessary to ensure that existing systems and processes align with current business goals, because old systems can, for example, ruin data integrity [1]. | ||
## Problem Statement |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
any source that support your claim of this problem?
There are some papers for this topic, where various modernization and assessment strategies are discussed. | ||
|
||
### 1.“Navigating the Modernization of Legacy Applications and Data: Effective Strategies and Best Practices” by Sivakumar Ponnusamy and Dinesh Eswararaj [2] | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is a very long headline!
These actions and calculations provided proposed actions for this particular company - a complete reengineering with addressing architectural style and consumption constraints, source code translation, operating system and hardware replacement and outsourcing of data centre management. | ||
|
||
In conclusion, this paper provided a different approach for the legacy systems improvement - a construct meta-model. | ||
# Discussion 💬 and Conclusions 🏁 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
very weak conclusion
Conclusion must summarizes the key findings, their significance, and potential implications. It wraps up the discussion and may suggest future research directions.
No description provided.