Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[MEX-674] Enable Redis autopipelining #1555

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 31, 2025

Conversation

mad2sm0key
Copy link
Contributor

Reasoning

  • the current version of sdk-nestjs does not support the enableAutoPipelining option.
  • updating to a compatible version allows us to leverage Redis autopipelining for improved performance.

Proposed Changes

  • update sdk-nestjs packages to a version that accepts enableAutoPipelining option
  • enable autopipelining in cache module

How to test

  • N/A

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 31, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 52.90%. Comparing base (9af8f25) to head (87683b0).
Report is 37 commits behind head on development.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##           development    #1555      +/-   ##
===============================================
- Coverage        52.92%   52.90%   -0.02%     
===============================================
  Files              269      269              
  Lines            10653    10656       +3     
  Branches           824      825       +1     
===============================================
  Hits              5638     5638              
- Misses            4276     4278       +2     
- Partials           739      740       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 52.90% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@mad2sm0key mad2sm0key merged commit ecbca77 into development Jan 31, 2025
2 of 3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants