CMR-10200: Fixing stringifyQuery by using qs's version

[william-valencia]

When using cmr-stac and specifying an intersects Point parameter via pystac, cmr-stac responds with an "APIError: {"errors":["Oops! Something has gone wrong. We have been alerted and are working to resolve the problem. Please try your request again later."]}"

What is actually happening is that the initial call is succeeding, but pystac is trying to get all the items, and cmr-stac fails when the next link is called. The next link is specified as follows: http://localhost:3000/stac/LPCLOUD/search?datetime=2024-01-01T00%3A00%3A00Z%2F2024-03-31T23%3A59%3A59Z&collections=HLSS30_2.0&intersects%5Btype%5D=Point&intersects%5Bcoordinates%5D=-105.97%2C35.78&cursor=eyJqc29uIjoiW1wibHBjbG91ZFwiLDE3MDkwNTY0NTAxMzAsMjg4MTI1MDg4OF0iLCJ1bW0iOiJbXCJscGNsb3VkXCIsMTcwOTA1NjQ1MDEzMCwyODgxMjUwODg4XSJ9

The failing part is the "intersects[coordinates]=-105.97,35.78" which cmr-stac's stringifyQuery function generates. On the next call, cmr-stac interprets this as a string although it is expecting an array and errors out.

The solution is to modify the stringifyQuery function to actually return an array, which is what cmr-stac is expecting. Luckily the "qs" library has such a function that does this well.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.05%. Comparing base (82d4a9b) to head (e8026f4).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #369      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.62%   88.05%   -0.57%     
==========================================
  Files          24       24              
  Lines        1169     1164       -5     
  Branches      257      256       -1     
==========================================
- Hits         1036     1025      -11     
- Misses        133      139       +6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.