Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

correct IRQ range check #791

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 21, 2024
Merged

correct IRQ range check #791

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 21, 2024

Conversation

jlevon
Copy link
Collaborator

@jlevon jlevon commented Mar 21, 2024

Our previous fuzzing attempts missed this incorrect range check, but
SPDK's fuzzing did catch it. Make the check using a saturating add so
that we account for overflow.

Fixes issue #790.

Reported-by: Sebastian Brzezinka [email protected]
Signed-off-by: John Levon [email protected]

Our previous fuzzing attempts missed this incorrect range check, but
SPDK's fuzzing did catch it. Make the check using a saturating add so
that we account for overflow.

Fixes issue #790.

Reported-by: Sebastian Brzezinka <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: John Levon <[email protected]>
@jlevon jlevon requested review from tmakatos and swapnili March 21, 2024 14:52
@jlevon jlevon merged commit b646559 into master Mar 21, 2024
7 of 8 checks passed
@jlevon jlevon deleted the irq-check-fix branch March 21, 2024 16:21
jlevon added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 4, 2024
Our previous fuzzing attempts missed this incorrect range check, but
SPDK's fuzzing did catch it. Make the check using a saturating add so
that we account for overflow.

Fixes issue #790.

Reported-by: Sebastian Brzezinka <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: John Levon <[email protected]>
jlevon added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2024
Fix up a mis-merge when cherry-picking a fix to this SPDK branch.

Fixes: a646db0 ("correct IRQ range check (#791)")
Signed-off-by: John Levon <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants