Refactor Background widget constructors to use private constructor for improved encapsulation #40
Conversation
…r improved encapsulation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Copilot wasn't able to review any files in this pull request.
Files not reviewed (1)
- oui/lib/src/utils/background.dart: Language not supported
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@lucasilverentand has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 1 minutes and 34 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes modify the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
…te OuiApp initialization; add background widget tests for color, gradient, and custom widget scenarios
…ation of parameters and improve fallback handling; enhance container decoration logic
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
oui/lib/src/app/oui_app.dart(1 hunks)oui/lib/src/router/oui_path.dart(0 hunks)oui/lib/src/router/oui_router.dart(1 hunks)oui/lib/src/utils/background.dart(2 hunks)oui/test/background_test.dart(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- oui/lib/src/router/oui_path.dart
🔇 Additional comments (6)
oui/lib/src/router/oui_router.dart (1)
10-10: Verify router initialization without registry
The removal of _registry parameter changes how the router is initialized. Please ensure that:
- All routing functionality remains intact
- Screen registration is handled appropriately elsewhere
oui/lib/src/utils/background.dart (3)
8-13: LGTM: Private constructor improves encapsulation
Good refactoring to make the constructor private while maintaining the same functionality through factory methods.
52-62: LGTM: Clear custom widget handling
The logic for handling custom widgets is clear and handles all cases appropriately.
65-66: LGTM: Proper null handling
Good improvement to explicitly return SizedBox.shrink() instead of potentially returning null.
oui/lib/src/app/oui_app.dart (1)
50-50: Verify screen registration flow
The removal of registry from router initialization represents a significant change in how screens are registered. Please ensure that:
- Screen registration still works as expected
- The registry in OuiApp is properly utilized elsewhere
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response as I have enough information to verify the screen registration flow:
Screen registration is properly handled through OuiScreenRegistry
The screen registration flow is working as expected:
- OuiApp still maintains the registry by creating
OuiScreenRegistrywith the root screen in its constructor - The registry is properly utilized by
OuiRouteInformationParserfor route matching - The router changes don't impact screen registration as it's handled separately through the registry
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for screen registration usage
rg -A 5 "OuiScreenRegistry" --type dart
# Search for router usage patterns
rg -A 5 "OuiRouter" --type dart
Length of output: 18576
oui/test/background_test.dart (1)
1-3: LGTM! Imports are appropriate and complete.
All necessary imports for widget testing are present and follow Flutter conventions.
…fficiency; enhance gradient handling in tests
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Backgroundclass by changing its constructor to private, while maintaining existing factory methods for background creation.OuiAppclass by removing the registry parameter.addmethod in theOuiPathclass to allow null segments without prior validation.Bug Fixes
Tests