Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding Drivenets in vendor list and config APIs #123

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mionescu-dn
Copy link

No description provided.

@supl
Copy link

supl commented Jan 31, 2025

@mionescu-dn Ionescu, Thank you for your updates.
Sorry for bothering you.
I also left a comment in Noam's PR #115 (comment)
I wonder if it's possible to support DriveNets in the KNE binding part.

Thank you!

otherwise topology parse will remove Drivenets devices.

Signed-off-by: Marius Ionescu <[email protected]>
@mionescu-dn
Copy link
Author

@mionescu-dn Ionescu, Thank you for your updates. Sorry for bothering you. I also left a comment in Noam's PR #115 (comment) I wonder if it's possible to support DriveNets in the KNE binding part.

Thank you!

Hi Plenty,

I appreciate your comment on this PR.
I’ve added an additional patch to this series for solver.go.

We’re currently working on providing compatibility with Ondatra and FeatureProfiles APIs.
This patch serves as a prerequisite for enabling FeatureProfiles static binding without the need for a custom Ondatra branch.

@supl
Copy link

supl commented Feb 3, 2025

@mionescu-dn Ionescu, Thank you for your updates. Sorry for bothering you. I also left a comment in Noam's PR #115 (comment) I wonder if it's possible to support DriveNets in the KNE binding part.
Thank you!

Hi Plenty,

I appreciate your comment on this PR. I’ve added an additional patch to this series for solver.go.

We’re currently working on providing compatibility with Ondatra and FeatureProfiles APIs. This patch serves as a prerequisite for enabling FeatureProfiles static binding without the need for a custom Ondatra branch.

Thank you very much.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants