Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove skip building graph check for quantization use case #2355

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

VijayanB
Copy link
Member

Description

For quantization indices, we don't have to apply building graph check since it is already faster, this is now only applied for fp32/16 indices and where threshold is configured.

Related Issues

part of #2215

Check List

  • New functionality includes testing.
  • New functionality has been documented.
  • API changes companion pull request created.
  • Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff.
  • Public documentation issue/PR created.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

For quantization indices, we don't have to apply building graph check
since it is already faster, this is now only applied for fp32/16 indices
and where threshold is configured.

Signed-off-by: Vijayan Balasubramanian <[email protected]>
@VijayanB VijayanB changed the base branch from feature/improve-performance-from-exact-search to main January 23, 2025 20:28
@VijayanB VijayanB marked this pull request as ready for review January 23, 2025 20:29
@VijayanB VijayanB changed the base branch from main to 2.x January 23, 2025 20:38
@VijayanB VijayanB changed the base branch from 2.x to main January 23, 2025 20:39
@VijayanB
Copy link
Member Author

Duplicate

@VijayanB VijayanB closed this Jan 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants