Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Python comps version bump, zz #1089

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: release-v1.17
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

gauron99
Copy link

No description provided.

@matejvasek
Copy link
Collaborator

/approve
/lgtm

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 10, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: gauron99, matejvasek

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@matejvasek
Copy link
Collaborator

/retest kn-plugin-func-func-util-117-on-pull-request

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 10, 2025

@matejvasek: The /retest command does not accept any targets.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

/test 417-e2e-oncluster-test
/test 417-images
/test 417-unit
/test 418-e2e-oncluster-test
/test 418-images
/test 418-unit

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

pull-ci-openshift-knative-kn-plugin-func-release-v1.17-417-e2e-oncluster-test
pull-ci-openshift-knative-kn-plugin-func-release-v1.17-417-images
pull-ci-openshift-knative-kn-plugin-func-release-v1.17-417-unit
pull-ci-openshift-knative-kn-plugin-func-release-v1.17-418-e2e-oncluster-test
pull-ci-openshift-knative-kn-plugin-func-release-v1.17-418-unit

In response to this:

/retest kn-plugin-func-func-util-117-on-pull-request

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Signed-off-by: David Fridrich <[email protected]>
@gauron99 gauron99 force-pushed the gauron99/update-python-comps-for-1-17-release branch from d61e8b5 to 63dedaa Compare February 10, 2025 19:25
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 10, 2025

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm label Feb 10, 2025
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Feb 10, 2025

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Please upload report for BASE (release-v1.17@4c8159a). Learn more about missing BASE report.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             release-v1.17    #1089   +/-   ##
================================================
  Coverage                 ?   64.55%           
================================================
  Files                    ?      131           
  Lines                    ?    15614           
  Branches                 ?        0           
================================================
  Hits                     ?    10080           
  Misses                   ?     4555           
  Partials                 ?      979           
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e-test 36.23% <ø> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-go 26.27% <ø> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-node 25.68% <ø> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-python 25.68% <ø> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-quarkus 25.82% <ø> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-rust 24.78% <ø> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-springboot 24.82% <ø> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-typescript 25.78% <ø> (?)
integration-tests 51.65% <ø> (?)
unit-tests 50.64% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@gauron99
Copy link
Author

/retest

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants