-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
planner: move rule_constant_propagation
to rule pkg. (#55231)
#55345
Conversation
Welcome @qingfeng777! |
Hi @qingfeng777. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a pingcap member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Hi @qingfeng777. Thanks for your PR. PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/ok-to-test |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #55345 +/- ##
================================================
+ Coverage 72.9164% 74.6749% +1.7585%
================================================
Files 1572 1578 +6
Lines 440067 441089 +1022
================================================
+ Hits 320881 329383 +8502
+ Misses 99480 91504 -7976
- Partials 19706 20202 +496
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
@qingfeng777 Please run the |
@hawkingrei Done |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Rest LGTM
basically from the workflow, you should add your idea first in the comment then file your pull request after we acked.
like
"idea: after migrating the file, the function validCompareConstantPredicate is not valid anymore, it is refed by logical selection in the core pkg. I moved it into constant_propagation.go
as in ruleutil for usage."
anyway, since this one is quite simple, these changes look good to me.
|
After my PR, you refactored the codebase. I have deleted it now. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: AilinKid, hawkingrei The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
[LGTM Timeline notifier]Timeline:
|
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: ref #55231
Problem Summary:
What changed and how does it work?
move rule_constant_propagation from core to rule pkg
Check List
Tests
Side effects
Documentation
Release note
Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.