Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "Rewrite the exponential decay process in C++. (#285)" #4

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

plietar
Copy link
Owner

@plietar plietar commented May 17, 2024

This reverts commit b3376d3.

@plietar
Copy link
Owner Author

plietar commented May 17, 2024

/benchmark

@plietar
Copy link
Owner Author

plietar commented May 17, 2024

/benchmark

Copy link

This is how benchmark results would change (along with a 95% confidence interval in relative change) if 369df0a is merged into master:

  • 🚀large_population: 2.76m -> 2.48m [-13.95%, -6.05%]
  • ❗🐌small_population: 33s -> 35.2s [+5.91%, +7.69%]
    Further explanation regarding interpretation and methodology can be found in the documentation.

@plietar
Copy link
Owner Author

plietar commented May 17, 2024

/benchmark

Copy link

This is how benchmark results would change (along with a 95% confidence interval in relative change) if 369df0a is merged into master:

  • 🚀large_population: 2.86m -> 2.47m [-14.38%, -12.96%]
  • ✔️small_population: 34.8s -> 35.1s [-1.99%, +3.6%]
    Further explanation regarding interpretation and methodology can be found in the documentation.

@plietar
Copy link
Owner Author

plietar commented May 17, 2024

/benchmark

Copy link

This is how benchmark results would change (along with a 95% confidence interval in relative change) if 369df0a is merged into master:

  • 🚀large_population: 2.74m -> 2.43m [-16.7%, -6.04%]
  • ✔️small_population: 35.1s -> 35.1s [-1.23%, +1.1%]
    Further explanation regarding interpretation and methodology can be found in the documentation.

@plietar
Copy link
Owner Author

plietar commented May 20, 2024

/benchmark

Copy link

This is how benchmark results would change (along with a 95% confidence interval in relative change) if 369df0a is merged into master:

  • 🚀large_population: 2.91m -> 2.5m [-20.3%, -7.29%]
  • ✔️small_population: 36.2s -> 36.1s [-1.64%, +1.25%]
    Further explanation regarding interpretation and methodology can be found in the documentation.

@plietar
Copy link
Owner Author

plietar commented May 20, 2024

/benchmark

Copy link

This is how benchmark results would change (along with a 95% confidence interval in relative change) if f2d3715 is merged into master:

  • 🚀large_population: 2.75m -> 2.44m [-14.25%, -8.61%]
  • ✔️small_population: 34.4s -> 34.5s [-1.85%, +2.45%]
    Further explanation regarding interpretation and methodology can be found in the documentation.

@plietar
Copy link
Owner Author

plietar commented May 21, 2024

/benchmark

Copy link

This is how benchmark results would change (along with a 95% confidence interval in relative change) if b4451e4 is merged into master:

  • 🚀large_population: 2.84m -> 2.52m [-13.22%, -9.1%]
  • ❗🐌small_population: 33.5s -> 36s [+5.12%, +9.93%]

Further explanation regarding interpretation and methodology can be found in the documentation.
Plots and raw data are available as artifacts of the workflow run.

@plietar
Copy link
Owner Author

plietar commented May 21, 2024

/benchmark

1 similar comment
@plietar
Copy link
Owner Author

plietar commented May 21, 2024

/benchmark

@plietar
Copy link
Owner Author

plietar commented May 21, 2024

/benchmark

@plietar
Copy link
Owner Author

plietar commented May 21, 2024

/benchmark

@plietar plietar force-pushed the master branch 2 times, most recently from 37772cb to 184c615 Compare May 21, 2024 13:24
@plietar
Copy link
Owner Author

plietar commented May 21, 2024

/benchmark

@plietar plietar force-pushed the master branch 2 times, most recently from 37772cb to 222cfdb Compare May 21, 2024 13:26
@plietar
Copy link
Owner Author

plietar commented May 21, 2024

/benchmark

@plietar plietar closed this Jun 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant