Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Index from Figgy. #167

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 23, 2017
Merged

Index from Figgy. #167

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 23, 2017

Conversation

tpendragon
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #161, closes #158

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.03%) to 92.02% when pulling c5a16ed on figgy_reindex into a9ff404 on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.1%) to 92.191% when pulling f041326 on figgy_reindex into a9ff404 on master.

{
"@id":"https://figgy.princeton.edu/catalog/a51c7f0b-4203-4ae9-b063-3e03fac1832b",
"@type":"skos:Concept",
"pref_label":"Advertising--Tourism",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is a separate issue, but this looks like a new wrinkle on the subject/category display issue. Should this display as "Tourism--Advertising" or "Advertising--Tourism" or something else?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I understood this to be the actual subject, such that the combined category / subject would be "Tourism -- Advertising--Tourism".

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That seems silly to me. But it's possible that is how it should be displayed, or that this is just a data problem — there are two other terms in that vocab that have dashes in them (Tourism--Economic aspects
Tourism--Social aspects).

I'll create a separate issue to handle those, and not worry about the display of these terms until we resolve that.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is the label as it exists in the LAE Subjects fixture, so I think that's a call for them.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've created pulibrary/figgy#456 to track this.

@escowles escowles mentioned this pull request Oct 23, 2017
end
it "converts the JSON-LD into a suitable solr document" do
stub_plum_jsonld(record: "b9e8325e-baf2-45e4-b32c-5e5b3755c8ef")
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've created a ticket to stop using VCR instead of doing some VCR and some webmock stubbing: #168

@escowles escowles merged commit 29a5954 into master Oct 23, 2017
@escowles escowles deleted the figgy_reindex branch October 23, 2017 18:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Deprecate RSpec responses for hydra-dev resources Handle Figgy Ephemera membership
4 participants