refactor 401 retrying into both auth methods #1910
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Label error. Requires exactly 1 of: bug, enhancement, major, minor, patch, skip-changelog. Found: |
gmishkin
force-pushed
the
jira-session-retry
branch
from
1176bfd to
4428531
Compare
gmishkin
changed the title
gmishkin
changed the title
|
@ssbarnea not sure what to do about the check failures, can you advise? |
|
Hi @adehad! Can you please review this PR? Thank you! |
gmishkin
force-pushed
the
jira-session-retry
branch
from
4428531 to
58cd331
Compare
|
Hi, This is now impacting multiple workflows on our side. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See #1904 for details on why.
This change refactors 401 retrying into the common base class, and for token auth the retry is implemented by clearing the session cookie and retrying with the same PAT as recommended.
In a few cases, the code is kind of ugly because in order to implement the retry I need to have a reference to the session object, which is only available if the tokenauth is created through the normal client constructor. If the tokenauth is created directly then the session might not be available. I am not sure if this is a supported case, if it's not then I might be able to clean up the checks for session and the asserts.