./cg/*.py – format, lint, & remove docstring spaces

[jGaboardi]

xref #589

This PR formats, lints, & removes docstring spaces from ./cg/*.py. Even though I am trying to do this in coherent sections (left out all cg subdirs) some of the PRs are going to be pains to review. I can split into file level PRs if desired.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #608 (fef4ad3) into main (92bc9d1) will increase coverage by 0.0%.
The diff coverage is 87.7%.

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##            main    #608   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage   84.2%   84.2%           
=====================================
  Files        137     137           
  Lines      14780   14711   -69     
=====================================
- Hits       12444   12389   -55     
+ Misses      2336    2322   -14     

Files	Coverage Δ
libpysal/cg/kdtree.py	67.9% <100.0%> (ø)
libpysal/cg/polygonQuadTreeStructure.py	85.7% <100.0%> (-0.2%)	⬇️
libpysal/cg/shapely_ext.py	20.2% <100.0%> (+0.6%)	⬆️
libpysal/cg/standalone.py	91.3% <100.0%> (-0.2%)	⬇️
libpysal/cg/voronoi.py	88.6% <100.0%> (+0.9%)	⬆️
libpysal/cg/locators.py	60.1% <80.0%> (-0.7%)	⬇️
libpysal/cg/shapes.py	89.9% <95.7%> (+0.1%)	⬆️
libpysal/cg/rtree.py	90.9% <93.3%> (-0.1%)	⬇️
libpysal/cg/alpha_shapes.py	85.7% <85.0%> (+1.3%)	⬆️
libpysal/cg/sphere.py	72.9% <66.7%> (+0.3%)	⬆️
... and 1 more

[martinfleis]

Yeah, maybe shorter diffs would be better for reviews.

[jGaboardi]

Yeah, maybe shorter diffs would be better for reviews.

How about smaller diffs for future PRs and keep this as is? Is that a fair comprise?

[martinfleis]

Yeah for sure, I already went through all of this :D

[jGaboardi]

@martinfleis I think we should close this PR until I figure out what's going on with ruff. There are some very strange changes in here now that I see it.

[jGaboardi]

Yeah for sure, I already went through all of this :D

Oh, you are already done? Curious about those strange changes though.

[martinfleis]

Curious about those strange changes though.

somehow the test are fine with that :D. Can you revert and check which errors it shows?

[martinfleis]

Alright. Seeing all this, we should probably try to move ahead with actual deprecation of most of the cg sooner than later.

[jGaboardi]

Alright. Seeing all this, we should probably try to move ahead with actual deprecation of most of the cg sooner than later.

xref ##484