gh-97850: Remove the mention of removal from ResourceReader docs

[tomasr8]

There is currently no plan to remove ResourceReader, especially given that the suggested alternative TraversableResources inherits from ResourceReader. Let's remove the mention of a removal for now.

Related discussion: #97850 (comment)

• Issue: Meta issue for cleaning up import system cruft #97850

---

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--128602.org.readthedocs.build/

[hugovk]

Also remove mention of removal from https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/main/Doc/deprecations/pending-removal-in-3.14.rst?

[tomasr8]

Also remove mention of removal from https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/main/Doc/deprecations/pending-removal-in-3.14.rst?

Yes, I missed that one. I'll update the PR in a bit!

[StanFromIreland]

@tomasr8 Done for you :)

[tomasr8]

Oh wait, that is the other ResourceReader that was actually removed in 3.14 (from importlib.abc). This PR updates the one in importlib.resources.abc which still exists. So there should be no need to update that document you mentioned Hugo.

Sorry for the confusion @StanFromIreland, I should've checked better :/ but thanks for the help!

[miss-islington-app]

Thanks @tomasr8 for the PR, and @jaraco for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.12, 3.13.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

[bedevere-app]

GH-128654 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.13 branch.

[bedevere-app]

GH-128655 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.12 branch.

[tomasr8]

The buildbot failure is unrelated (it's in test_multiprocessing_forkserver while this PR only touches the docs)