-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 438
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support Half/BFloat16 in op_allclose #7766
Support Half/BFloat16 in op_allclose #7766
Conversation
We incorrectly required these types to be bitwise-identical rather than close. (I had to develop this internally because the op_allclose_test doesn't run in OSS.) Differential Revision: [D68366831](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D68366831/) [ghstack-poisoned]
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/7766
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ❌ 1 New FailureAs of commit c620875 with merge base 2db2bd2 ( NEW FAILURE - The following job has failed:
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
We incorrectly required these types to be bitwise-identical rather than close. (I had to develop this internally because the op_allclose_test doesn't run in OSS.) Differential Revision: [D68366831](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D68366831/) ghstack-source-id: 262016378 Pull Request resolved: #7766
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D68366831 |
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D68366831 |
We incorrectly required these types to be bitwise-identical rather than close. Partial fix for #7748. (I had to develop this internally because the op_allclose_test doesn't run in OSS.) Differential Revision: [D68366831](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D68366831/) [ghstack-poisoned]
Pull Request resolved: #7766 We incorrectly required these types to be bitwise-identical rather than close. (I had to develop this internally because the op_allclose_test doesn't run in OSS.) Differential Revision: [D68366831](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D68366831/) ghstack-source-id: 262600586
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D68366831 |
99489fe
into
gh/swolchok/149/base
Pull Request resolved: #7766 We incorrectly required these types to be bitwise-identical rather than close. (I had to develop this internally because the op_allclose_test doesn't run in OSS.) Differential Revision: [D68366831](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D68366831/) ghstack-source-id: 262600586 Co-authored-by: Scott Wolchok <[email protected]>
Pull Request resolved: #7766 We incorrectly required these types to be bitwise-identical rather than close. (I had to develop this internally because the op_allclose_test doesn't run in OSS.) Differential Revision: [D68366831](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D68366831/) ghstack-source-id: 262600586 Co-authored-by: Scott Wolchok <[email protected]>
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#7766 We incorrectly required these types to be bitwise-identical rather than close. (I had to develop this internally because the op_allclose_test doesn't run in OSS.) Differential Revision: [D68366831](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D68366831/) ghstack-source-id: 262600586 Co-authored-by: Scott Wolchok <[email protected]>
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
We incorrectly required these types to be bitwise-identical rather than close. Partial fix for #7748.
(I had to develop this internally because the op_allclose_test doesn't run in OSS.)
Differential Revision: D68366831