Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ET-VK][ez] Add back tensor dim check #7938

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 24, 2025

Conversation

SS-JIA
Copy link
Contributor

@SS-JIA SS-JIA commented Jan 24, 2025

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

Context

Vulkan cannot represent higher dimensional tensors (tensors with dim > 4) at the moment, but due to some refactors implemented last year the partitioner check to avoid lowering ops that involve high dimensional tensors was accidentally removed.

This diff adds back the check, as well as a test to verify that high dimensional tensors do not get lowered.

Differential Revision: D68630966

## Context

Vulkan cannot represent higher dimensional tensors (tensors with dim > 4) at the moment, but due to some refactors implemented last year the partitioner check to avoid lowering ops that involve high dimensional tensors was accidentally removed.

This diff adds back the check, as well as a test to verify that high dimensional tensors do not get lowered.

Differential Revision: [D68630966](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D68630966/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Jan 24, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/7938

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 1 New Failure

As of commit ab55b29 with merge base 57ef834 (image):

NEW FAILURE - The following job has failed:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Jan 24, 2025
SS-JIA added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 24, 2025
## Context

Vulkan cannot represent higher dimensional tensors (tensors with dim > 4) at the moment, but due to some refactors implemented last year the partitioner check to avoid lowering ops that involve high dimensional tensors was accidentally removed.

This diff adds back the check, as well as a test to verify that high dimensional tensors do not get lowered.

Differential Revision: [D68630966](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D68630966/)

ghstack-source-id: 262922165
Pull Request resolved: #7938
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D68630966

Copy link

This PR needs a release notes: label

If your changes are user facing and intended to be a part of release notes, please use a label starting with release notes:.

If not, please add the topic: not user facing label.

To add a label, you can comment to pytorchbot, for example
@pytorchbot label "topic: not user facing"

For more information, see
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/PyTorch-AutoLabel-Bot#why-categorize-for-release-notes-and-how-does-it-work.

## Context

Vulkan cannot represent higher dimensional tensors (tensors with dim > 4) at the moment, but due to some refactors implemented last year the partitioner check to avoid lowering ops that involve high dimensional tensors was accidentally removed.

This diff adds back the check, as well as a test to verify that high dimensional tensors do not get lowered.

Differential Revision: [D68630966](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D68630966/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
SS-JIA added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 24, 2025
Pull Request resolved: #7938

## Context

Vulkan cannot represent higher dimensional tensors (tensors with dim > 4) at the moment, but due to some refactors implemented last year the partitioner check to avoid lowering ops that involve high dimensional tensors was accidentally removed.

This diff adds back the check, as well as a test to verify that high dimensional tensors do not get lowered.
ghstack-source-id: 262929769
@exported-using-ghexport

Differential Revision: [D68630966](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D68630966/)
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D68630966

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot merged commit b4f7994 into gh/SS-JIA/172/base Jan 24, 2025
44 of 47 checks passed
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/SS-JIA/172/head branch January 24, 2025 19:13
kirklandsign pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 24, 2025
Pull Request resolved: #7938

## Context

Vulkan cannot represent higher dimensional tensors (tensors with dim > 4) at the moment, but due to some refactors implemented last year the partitioner check to avoid lowering ops that involve high dimensional tensors was accidentally removed.

This diff adds back the check, as well as a test to verify that high dimensional tensors do not get lowered.
ghstack-source-id: 262929769
@exported-using-ghexport

Differential Revision: [D68630966](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D68630966/)

Co-authored-by: Stephen Jia <[email protected]>
YIWENX14 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 28, 2025
Pull Request resolved: #7938

## Context

Vulkan cannot represent higher dimensional tensors (tensors with dim > 4) at the moment, but due to some refactors implemented last year the partitioner check to avoid lowering ops that involve high dimensional tensors was accidentally removed.

This diff adds back the check, as well as a test to verify that high dimensional tensors do not get lowered.
ghstack-source-id: 262929769
@exported-using-ghexport

Differential Revision: [D68630966](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D68630966/)

Co-authored-by: Stephen Jia <[email protected]>
zonglinpeng pushed a commit to zonglinpeng/executorch that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2025
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#7938

## Context

Vulkan cannot represent higher dimensional tensors (tensors with dim > 4) at the moment, but due to some refactors implemented last year the partitioner check to avoid lowering ops that involve high dimensional tensors was accidentally removed.

This diff adds back the check, as well as a test to verify that high dimensional tensors do not get lowered.
ghstack-source-id: 262929769
@exported-using-ghexport

Differential Revision: [D68630966](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D68630966/)

Co-authored-by: Stephen Jia <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. fb-exported
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants