1713 Revise code for generating production rules #1721
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
michaelhkay
added
Editorial
|
Fix #1713 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The main change here is to change the way "scraps" are expanded: these are the local collections of production rules that appear inline within the spec. These are now driven by a single
prodrecapelement naming the rule to be expanded, and the logic is now automated for deciding (a) which subsidiary production rules to include in the scrap, and (b) which occurrence of a production rule to use as the target for a hyperlinked reference to that rule, depending on where the reference appears.Along with this there has been a fair bit of deletion of legacy code and general modernisation (e.g using XSLT 2.0 and 3.0 constructs where appropriate).