Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Julia interface #232

Merged
merged 33 commits into from
Feb 14, 2024
Merged

Julia interface #232

merged 33 commits into from
Feb 14, 2024

Conversation

amontoison
Copy link
Member

@amontoison amontoison commented Jan 21, 2024

@amontoison
Copy link
Member Author

amontoison commented Jan 22, 2024

@nimgould I have this complex error on Windows when I test GALAHAD.jl:
https://github.com/ralna/GALAHAD/actions/runs/7607161285/job/20714051762?pr=232#step:19:157

Do you have an idea of what is the issue?
We have an error when we call fdc_initialize.

@nimgould
Copy link
Contributor

I have no idea, the statement

  IF ( TRIM( control%unsymmetric_linear_solver ) == 'getr' )               &
    control%use_sls = .TRUE.

is perfectly valid fortran. So it looks like a compiler bug

@amontoison amontoison force-pushed the julia_interface branch 2 times, most recently from 8f7ca53 to 1f5ed66 Compare February 10, 2024 17:07
@amontoison
Copy link
Member Author

I have no idea, the statement

  IF ( TRIM( control%unsymmetric_linear_solver ) == 'getr' )               &
    control%use_sls = .TRUE.

is perfectly valid fortran. So it looks like a compiler bug

You were right Nick!
All tests of the Julia interfaces work on Windows with GCC 11.
I still need to write Julia tests for 16/54 packages to finalize my pull request.
After that, my duty will be completed.

@amontoison amontoison merged commit 79cfa46 into ralna:master Feb 14, 2024
18 of 19 checks passed
@amontoison amontoison deleted the julia_interface branch February 14, 2024 01:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants