Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow Python interfaces to optionally read from specfile #366

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jfowkes
Copy link
Collaborator

@jfowkes jfowkes commented Jan 9, 2025

For now just let UGO Python interface read from specfile, more to follow. @AndrewLister-STFC please test.

@jfowkes jfowkes added enhancement New feature or request Python An issue with the Python interfaces labels Jan 9, 2025
@jfowkes jfowkes force-pushed the python-read-specfile branch from d7606f0 to 5b89529 Compare January 9, 2025 16:10
@jfowkes jfowkes marked this pull request as draft January 9, 2025 16:15
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 43.38%. Comparing base (d56eb41) to head (5b89529).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #366   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   43.38%   43.38%           
=======================================
  Files         313      313           
  Lines      161619   161619           
  Branches    55978    55978           
=======================================
+ Hits        70122    70123    +1     
  Misses      73963    73963           
+ Partials    17534    17533    -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request Python An issue with the Python interfaces
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants