Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

RDK-52028: Add CMS and WB to AVOutput #5969

Open
wants to merge 29 commits into
base: sprint/25Q1
Choose a base branch
from
Open

RDK-52028: Add CMS and WB to AVOutput #5969

wants to merge 29 commits into from

Conversation

tamilselvanak
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

tamilselvanak and others added 17 commits January 3, 2025 03:41
@tamilselvanak
RDK-52028: Add CMS and WB to AVOutput
1c01b92
@tamilselvanak
RDK-52028: corrected resetCMS
22b8480
@tamilselvanak
RDK-52028: ResetCMS build issues
923154f
@tamilselvanak
RDK-52028: AutoBacklightMode issues
89f08a7
@tamilselvanak
RDK-52028: ReadCapabilitiesConf issues
458f324
@tamilselvanak
RDK-52028 : allow save only for custom WB
a970a5a
@tamilselvanak
RDK-52028 : CMS capabilty changes
581aaf8
@tamilselvanak
RDK-52028: Fix CMS build issues
538233c
@tamilselvanak
Merge branch 'rdkcentral:sprint/25Q1' into RDK-52028-25Q1
818121b
@tamilselvanak
RDK-52028 : RRemove ODM enum
6dabf88
@tamilselvanak
RDK-52028 : Corrected get2PointWBCaps issue
8e742f5
@tamilselvanak
RDK-52028 : WB Cap API failures
46ce46f
@tamilselvanak
Merge branch 'rdkcentral:sprint/25Q1' into RDK-52028-25Q1
1c71397
@tamilselvanak
RDK-52028 : Fix WB Capability issues
88aeffd
@tamilselvanak
Merge branch 'rdkcentral:sprint/25Q1' into RDK-52028-25Q1
5d3925e
@tamilselvanak
Merge branch 'rdkcentral:sprint/25Q1' into RDK-52028-25Q1
8abd060
@tamilselvanak
RDK-52028 : Fix set and reset DV mode issue
917f7c3
upatel-sky
upatel-sky approved these changes Jan 27, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@upatel-sky upatel-sky left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we do need to use capDetails_t. We can make use of capVectors_t with array size 1 which is same as capDetails_t. We can do this later as part of DV Mode redesign we are planning.

@upatel-sky upatel-sky mentioned this pull request Jan 30, 2025
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@upatel-sky upatel-sky upatel-sky approved these changes

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@tamilselvanak @upatel-sky