Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added WrapperPlayServerSculkVibrationSignal #380

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: 2.0
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

NoJokeFNA
Copy link
Contributor

https://wiki.vg/Protocol#Sculk_Vibration_Signal
Tested Server-Versions: 1.18.2

Copy link
Owner

@retrooper retrooper left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Instead of a string identifier, maybe see if the ResourceLocation can be used. PacketWrapper#readResourceLocation or readIdentifier, is what it might be called in the wrappers.

@NoJokeFNA
Copy link
Contributor Author

I will test it today or tomorrow.

@NoJokeFNA NoJokeFNA requested a review from retrooper May 20, 2022 12:40
@retrooper
Copy link
Owner

Does it work on 1.8?

@NoJokeFNA
Copy link
Contributor Author

No. Sculks were introduced on newer versions.

Copy link
Owner

@retrooper retrooper left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

On wiki.vg it says the "destination" (field after the destination identifier) can either be a VarInt ENTITY ID or a Long encoded block position. So this code might not always work? https://wiki.vg/Protocol#Sculk_Vibration_Signal

@NoJokeFNA
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yea but I don't know under which circumstances. I tested it for a few time and haven't received any errors or such.

@retrooper
Copy link
Owner

Have you checked minecraft's vanilla code?

@retrooper
Copy link
Owner

I'll check.

@retrooper
Copy link
Owner

Depends on the identifier. I think the identifier can either be "minecraft:entity" or "minecraft:block" according to vanilla code.

@retrooper
Copy link
Owner

But I'd say do some debugging too.

@NoJokeFNA
Copy link
Contributor Author

Alright, will do it later

@NoJokeFNA NoJokeFNA requested a review from retrooper June 11, 2022 20:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants