Rollup of 6 pull requests #135260
Merged
Rollup of 6 pull requests #135260
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…e in diagnostic Fix rust-lang#135209.
"Elements" are `RegionElement`s. The dense location mapping was removed from the element containers a while ago but didn't rename its use-sites. Most of the old naming only used the mapping, and are better named `location_map`.
Its original naming hides the fact that it's related to datalog polonius, and bound to be deleted in the near future. It also conflicts with the expected name for the actual NLL location map, and prefixing it with its use will make the differentiation possible.
This is another strangely named struct (and associated fields) that is hard to see was related to datalog polonius.
This reverts commit 2316749.
This reverts commit f5577a8.
…rrors
Exhaustively handle expressions in patterns
We currently have this invariant in HIR that a `PatKind::Lit` or a `PatKind::Range` only contains
* `ExprKind::Lit`
* `ExprKind::UnOp(Neg, ExprKind::Lit)`
* `ExprKind::Path`
* `ExprKind::ConstBlock`
So I made `PatKind::Lit` and `PatKind::Range` stop containing `Expr`, and instead created a `PatLit` type whose `kind` enum only contains those variants.
The only place code got more complicated was in clippy, as it couldn't share as much anymore with `Expr` handling
It may be interesting on merging `ExprKind::{Path,Lit,ConstBlock}` in the future and using the same `PatLit` type (under a new name).
Then it should also be easier to eliminate any and all `UnOp(Neg, Lit) | Lit` matching that we have across the compiler. Some day we should fold the negation into the literal itself and just store it on the numeric literals
…-ozkan triagebot: mark tidy changes with a more specific `A-tidy` label r? `@onur-ozkan`
…errors Ensure that we don't try to access fields on a non-struct pattern type Fix rust-lang#135209.
A couple simple borrowck cleanups This PR has a couple simple renamings: - it's been a long time since the mapping from `Location`s to `PointIndex`es was extracted from `RegionElements` into the `DenseLocationMap`, but only the types were renamed at the time. borrowck still refers to this map as `elements`. That's confusing, especially since sometimes we also use the mapping via `LivenessValues`, and makes more sense as `location_map` instead. - to clarify `LocationTable` is not as general as it sounds, and is only for datalog polonius. In this branch I didn't rename the handful of `location_table` fields and params to `polonius_table`, but can do that to differentiate it even more from `location_map`. I did try it locally and it looks worthwhile, so if you'd prefer I can also push it here. (Or we could even switch these datalog types and fields to even more explicit names) - to clarify the incomprehensible `AllFacts`, it is renamed to `PoloniusFacts`. These can be referred to as `facts` within the legacy polonius module, but as `polonius_facts` outside of it to make it clear that they're not about NLLs (nor are they about in-tree polonius but that'll be magically fixed when they're removed in the future) r? `@matthewjasper`
Fix release notes link Reported by `@ognevny` in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134568/files#r1905347925.
…ark-Simulacrum Revert rust-lang#131365 This PR reverts rust-lang#131365, following the revert we did on the beta branches for both 1.84 and 1.85. While the PR passes CI successfully on master, as soon as we branch off beta it starts failing in the newly created beta branch. This caused the release team to revert it for both 1.84 and 1.85, and if nothing is done it would continue being reverted every cycle. `@heiseish` (PR author) feel free to submit the PR again in the future: this revert doesn't represent the release team rejecting your change, but just a (hopefully temporary!) revert to ensure future beta branches can be created without reverting it each time. When submitting the PR again, I recommend you test your changes by configuring `rust.channel` to both `nightly` and `beta` in your `config.toml`. You can see the latest failure [here](rust-lang#135163 (comment)).
rustbot
added
A-meta
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=6 |
bors
removed
the
S-waiting-on-review
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 8, 2025
…iaskrgr Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#134228 (Exhaustively handle expressions in patterns) - rust-lang#135194 (triagebot: mark tidy changes with a more specific `A-tidy` label) - rust-lang#135222 (Ensure that we don't try to access fields on a non-struct pattern type) - rust-lang#135250 (A couple simple borrowck cleanups) - rust-lang#135252 (Fix release notes link) - rust-lang#135253 (Revert rust-lang#131365) Failed merges: - rust-lang#135195 (Make `lit_to_mir_constant` and `lit_to_const` infallible) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) |
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors retry |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
|
📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:
previous master: a580b5c379 In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
A-tidylabel #135194 (triagebot: mark tidy changes with a more specificA-tidylabel)Failed merges:
lit_to_mir_constantandlit_to_constinfallible #135195 (Makelit_to_mir_constantandlit_to_constinfallible)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup