-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Making a case for unique identifier for each synset / word-meaning set #409
Comments
If I have unique synset numbers like the following, I can encode explicitly the relationship between them.
|
This is possible only when there are unique synsets (not Lnums) assigned to each synset / word-meaning set in samAnArthaka kosha and anekArthaka kosha respectively. The question is what would be the ideal place to give this information? |
|
AFAIK, Wordnet (https://wordnet.princeton.edu/) is the primary example of synsets (for English). In wordnet, synsets are identified by a specific word (e.g. the synset for 'dog'). Bing chat tells
Perhaps we should model our thinking about synsets after the wordnet approach. i.e., learn how wordnet works, and make a Sanskrit-wordnet similarly. From a first glance, it appears that the underlying data structures for wordnet are likely to be described, either at the wordnet site or at nltk. Bing chat responds to question how to make wordnet for another language using nltk?
|
Sanskrit Wordnet - https://www.cfilt.iitb.ac.in/wordnet/webswn/wn.php |
Dictionaries sometimes encode relationships between two synsets.
We need to capture such information.
It is possible only if synset is uniquely identifiable. We can internally link them and depict the relationships between them.
e.g. शार्ङ्ग is विष्णु's चाप.
I have written it currently as विष्णुचाप, which is not so elegant way of doing it.
Data
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: