Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Switch to loops simple connectivity #1082

Merged

Conversation

frheault
Copy link
Member

@frheault frheault commented Dec 12, 2024

Quick description

Simple improvement in speed for the simple connectivity, seems to be around 60sec. to 35sec. on my 700MB tractogram. Fix #1058
...

Type of change

Check the relevant options.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

Provide data, screenshots, command line to test (if relevant)

...

Checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project (run autopep8)
  • I added relevant citations to scripts, modules and functions docstrings and descriptions
  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I moved all functions from the script file (except the argparser and main) to scilpy modules
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes

@arnaudbore arnaudbore self-requested a review December 12, 2024 15:29
Copy link
Contributor

@arnaudbore arnaudbore left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

GTG

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 12, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 69.45%. Comparing base (5bcfd7f) to head (3918ffb).
Report is 53 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1082      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   69.45%   69.45%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         447      447              
  Lines       24025    24048      +23     
  Branches     3280     3289       +9     
==========================================
+ Hits        16687    16702      +15     
- Misses       5943     5947       +4     
- Partials     1395     1399       +4     
Components Coverage Δ
Scripts 70.24% <82.45%> (-0.02%) ⬇️
Library 68.38% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️

@arnaudbore arnaudbore added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 16, 2024
Merged via the queue into scilus:master with commit 63fcfc1 Dec 16, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

toDo: improve loop in my script
2 participants