Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Explicit Names For CI #241

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Apr 5, 2022
Merged

Add Explicit Names For CI #241

merged 14 commits into from
Apr 5, 2022

Conversation

tateexon
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@tateexon tateexon requested a review from krebernisak March 29, 2022 13:36
krebernisak
krebernisak previously approved these changes Mar 29, 2022
.github/workflows/chaos.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/gauntlet.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/golangci-lint.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
fix go lint to not be ignored for required checks
.github/workflows/gauntlet.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
aalu1418
aalu1418 previously approved these changes Apr 1, 2022
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ linters-settings:
- name: error-return
- name: error-strings
- name: error-naming
- name: exported
# - name: exported
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should document all Go exported (public) types

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@tateexon tateexon merged commit 280dde0 into develop Apr 5, 2022
@tateexon tateexon deleted the ci_names_triggers branch April 5, 2022 15:55
akhilchainani pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2022
* Update names for ci jobs
* update naming to be lowercase snakecase
fix go lint to not be ignored for required checks
* cleanup npm token
* Clean up chaos github action to use nix and add golint to asdf and make
* bump versions
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants