Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix FIPS packages been overwrite by upstream package issue. #21521

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

liuh-80
Copy link
Contributor

@liuh-80 liuh-80 commented Jan 24, 2025

Fix FIPS packages been overwrite by upstream package issue.

Why I did it

FIPS break on 202405 because not latest version, because:

  1. Debian version higher than fips version
  2. Some package version does not add to reproduceable build config file.
Work item tracking
  • Microsoft ADO: 30945454

How I did it

Fix FIPS packages been overwrite by upstream package issue.

How to verify it

Pass all UT.

Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)

  • 201811
  • 201911
  • 202006
  • 202012
  • 202106
  • 202111
  • 202205
  • 202211
  • 202305

Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)

  • []

Description for the changelog

Fix FIPS packages been overwrite by upstream package issue.

Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes

A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run Azure.sonic-buildimage

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run Azure.sonic-buildimage

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run Azure.sonic-buildimage

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run Azure.sonic-buildimage

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run Azure.sonic-buildimage

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@liuh-80
Copy link
Contributor Author

liuh-80 commented Jan 26, 2025

Verified the package can be block with unhold command, will fix this issue on master branch with another pr.

@liuh-80 liuh-80 closed this Jan 26, 2025
@liuh-80
Copy link
Contributor Author

liuh-80 commented Jan 26, 2025

Verified the package can be block with hold/unhold command, will fix this issue on master branch with another PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants