Cambios #1
Cambios #1
Conversation
Cambios en las variables del Nodo y la Cola
Cambio de la variable Data por Tiquete
Co-authored-by: sourcery-ai[bot] <58596630+sourcery-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: sourcery-ai[bot] <58596630+sourcery-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
This is a benchmark review for experiment This pull request was cloned from Experiment configurationreview_config:
# User configuration for the review
# - benchmark - use the user config from the benchmark reviews
# - <value> - use the value directly
user_review_config:
enable_ai_review: true
enable_rule_comments: false
enable_complexity_comments: benchmark
enable_security_comments: benchmark
enable_tests_comments: benchmark
enable_comment_suggestions: benchmark
enable_functionality_review: benchmark
enable_pull_request_summary: benchmark
enable_review_guide: benchmark
enable_approvals: true
ai_review_config:
# The model responses to use for the experiment
# - benchmark - use the model responses from the benchmark reviews
# - llm - call the language model to generate responses
model_responses:
comments_model: benchmark
comment_area_model: benchmark
comment_validation_model: benchmark
comment_suggestion_model: benchmark
complexity_model: benchmark
docstrings_model: benchmark
functionality_model: benchmark
security_model: benchmark
tests_model: benchmark
pull_request_summary_model: benchmark
review_guide_model: benchmark
# The pull request dataset to run the experiment on
pull_request_dataset:
- https://github.com/ghostbsd/ghostbsd-src/pull/328
- https://github.com/dan5e3s6ares/a-real-mock-api/pull/3
- https://github.com/unknowIfGuestInDream/document/pull/117
- https://github.com/code-Harsh247/yt_playlist_exporter/pull/13
- https://github.com/Fenigor/align-game/pull/21
- https://github.com/lehuygiang28/vnpay/pull/16
- https://github.com/nuxeo/nuxeo-drive/pull/5053
- https://github.com/skypointcloud/skypoint-langchain/pull/15
- https://github.com/4DNucleome/PartSeg/pull/1114
- https://github.com/4DNucleome/PartSeg/pull/1115
- https://github.com/4DNucleome/PartSeg/pull/1116
- https://github.com/dreamerminsk/tasked/pull/77
- https://github.com/dreamerminsk/tasked/pull/78
- https://github.com/dreamerminsk/tasked/pull/79
- https://github.com/dreamerminsk/tasked/pull/80
- https://github.com/medulla-tech/medulla/pull/619
- https://github.com/medulla-tech/medulla/pull/620
- https://github.com/medulla-tech/medulla/pull/621
- https://github.com/mraniki/MyLLM/pull/574
- https://github.com/alexsoyes/ai-driven-dev-community/pull/5
- https://github.com/alexsoyes/ai-driven-dev-community/pull/6
- https://github.com/cpp-lln-lab/CPP_HPC/pull/34
- https://github.com/cpp-lln-lab/CPP_HPC/pull/35
- https://github.com/Eliver-Salazar/PED/pull/4
- https://github.com/Eliver-Salazar/PED/pull/6
- https://github.com/Eliver-Salazar/PED/pull/7
- https://github.com/usama-maxenius/image-editor/pull/129
- https://github.com/usama-maxenius/image-editor/pull/125
- https://github.com/usama-maxenius/image-editor/pull/126
- https://github.com/usama-maxenius/image-editor/pull/127
- https://github.com/usama-maxenius/image-editor/pull/128
- https://github.com/elixir-cloud-aai/tus-storagehandler/pull/3
- https://github.com/iptux-src/iptux/pull/617
- https://github.com/jhanley634/dojo-2024-06-18-geocode/pull/8
- https://github.com/phenobarbital/asyncdb/pull/1155
- https://github.com/bengosney/cerberus/pull/962
- https://github.com/gdsfactory/klive/pull/11
- https://github.com/pozapas/awesome-crowdynamics/pull/3
- https://github.com/flet-dev/flet/pull/3582
- https://github.com/jackdewinter/pymarkdown/pull/1118
- https://github.com/erxes/erxes/pull/5496
- https://github.com/erxes/erxes/pull/5497
- https://github.com/erxes/erxes/pull/5499
- https://github.com/erxes/erxes/pull/5500
- https://github.com/erxes/erxes/pull/5503
- https://github.com/erxes/erxes/pull/5504
- https://github.com/erxes/erxes/pull/5501
- https://github.com/erxes/erxes/pull/5502
- https://github.com/alanrenouf/ECSExample/pull/1
- https://github.com/ICRAR/shark/pull/17
review_comment_labels:
- label: correct
question: Is this comment correct?
- label: helpful
question: Is this comment helpful?
- label: comment-type
question: Is the comment type correct?
- label: comment-area
question: Is the comment area correct?
- label: llm-test
question: |
What type of LLM test could this comment become?
- 👍 - this comment is really good/important and we should always make it
- 👎 - this comment is really bad and we should never make it
- no reaction - don't turn this comment into an LLM test
# Benchmark reviews generated by running
# python -m scripts.experiment benchmark <experiment_name>
benchmark_reviews: []
|
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis pull request refactors the Queue and Node classes to replace the use of the Data class with the Tiquete class. The changes include updating methods to use the getId method instead of getValue, ensuring consistency and improving code readability. File-Level Changes
Tips
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @sourcery-ai-experiments-bot - I've reviewed your changes and found some issues that need to be addressed.
Blocking issues:
- Duplicate while loop. (link)
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🔴 General issues: 1 blocking issue, 5 other issues
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.
| @@ -1,5 +1,10 @@ | |||
|
|
|||
| package Data; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
issue: Inconsistent package naming convention.
The package name 'Data' should be in lowercase to follow Java naming conventions. Consider changing it to 'data'.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What type of LLM test could this comment become?
- 👍 - this comment is really good/important and we should always make it
- 👎 - this comment is really bad and we should never make it
- no reaction - don't turn this comment into an LLM test
| @@ -29,7 +34,7 @@ public boolean isEmpty() { | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| //Encolar es lo mismo que agregar | |||
| public void addNode(Data pData){ | |||
| public void addNode(Tiquete pData){ | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion: Inconsistent parameter naming.
The parameter name 'pData' should be consistent with the rest of the codebase. Consider renaming it to 'dato' to match the naming convention used in the Node class.
| public void addNode(Tiquete pData){ | |
| public void addNode(Tiquete dato){ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What type of LLM test could this comment become?
- 👍 - this comment is really good/important and we should always make it
- 👎 - this comment is really bad and we should never make it
- no reaction - don't turn this comment into an LLM test
| @@ -111,7 +116,12 @@ public void sortQueue(){ | |||
| Queue temp = new Queue(); | |||
| while(head!=null){ | |||
| temp.addNode(this.getBiggest().getData()); | |||
| this.extractNode(this.getBiggest().getData().getValue()); | |||
| while(head!=null){ | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
issue: Duplicate while loop.
There is a duplicate while loop in the sortQueue method. The inner while loop should be removed to avoid unnecessary iterations.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What type of LLM test could this comment become?
- 👍 - this comment is really good/important and we should always make it
- 👎 - this comment is really bad and we should never make it
- no reaction - don't turn this comment into an LLM test
| this.extractNode(this.getBiggest().getData().getValue()); | ||
| while(head!=null){ | ||
| temp.addNode(this.getBiggest().getData()); | ||
| var biggestData = this.getBiggest().getData(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion: Use of 'var' keyword.
The use of 'var' keyword can reduce readability. Consider explicitly specifying the type of 'biggestData' for better clarity.
| var biggestData = this.getBiggest().getData(); | |
| DataType biggestData = this.getBiggest().getData(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What type of LLM test could this comment become?
- 👍 - this comment is really good/important and we should always make it
- 👎 - this comment is really bad and we should never make it
- no reaction - don't turn this comment into an LLM test
| private Node next; | ||
| private Object data; | ||
| //Comentario |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
nitpick: Unnecessary comment.
The comment '//Comentario' does not add any value to the code. Consider removing it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What type of LLM test could this comment become?
- 👍 - this comment is really good/important and we should always make it
- 👎 - this comment is really bad and we should never make it
- no reaction - don't turn this comment into an LLM test
| return data; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| public void setDato(Data data) { | ||
| public void setDato(Tiquete data) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion: Inconsistent method naming.
The method name 'setDato' should be consistent with the rest of the codebase. Consider renaming it to 'setData' to match the naming convention used in the Node class.
| public void setDato(Tiquete data) { | |
| public void setData(Tiquete data) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What type of LLM test could this comment become?
- 👍 - this comment is really good/important and we should always make it
- 👎 - this comment is really bad and we should never make it
- no reaction - don't turn this comment into an LLM test
Summary by Sourcery
Refactored the Queue and Node classes to replace the Data class with the Tiquete class for node data, and updated relevant methods to use the getId method instead of getValue.