Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade pydantic to ^2.6 #571

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 19, 2024
Merged

Conversation

mwildehahn
Copy link
Contributor

Fix for #570

@okhat
Copy link
Collaborator

okhat commented Mar 6, 2024

I'm not really sure what is failing but the checks are mostly not passing here

@mwildehahn mwildehahn force-pushed the mh-upgrade-pydantic branch from 68d9b03 to 5a7543c Compare March 6, 2024 19:32
@mwildehahn
Copy link
Contributor Author

hm not sure why it is failing either, seems to be an issue checking out my fork. I just rebased to bonk the tests again to see if they pass this time

@isaacbmiller
Copy link
Collaborator

Rebase/merge main again and they should pass

@arnavsinghvi11
Copy link
Collaborator

@mwildehahn @isaacbmiller tests still failing

@isaacbmiller
Copy link
Collaborator

I think you forgot to push?

@mwildehahn mwildehahn force-pushed the mh-upgrade-pydantic branch from 5a7543c to 87f45db Compare March 10, 2024 17:09
@mwildehahn
Copy link
Contributor Author

Rebased

@okhat
Copy link
Collaborator

okhat commented Mar 10, 2024

Running the checks. Why 2.6+ though? Why not allow a bit lower

@mwildehahn
Copy link
Contributor Author

Good call, I had just been focusing on my use case 😄 . Updated!

@mwildehahn mwildehahn force-pushed the mh-upgrade-pydantic branch from ef6739c to e637a56 Compare March 15, 2024 22:18
@mwildehahn
Copy link
Contributor Author

Fixed the merge conflict

@okhat okhat merged commit 96c9128 into stanfordnlp:main Mar 19, 2024
4 checks passed
@okhat
Copy link
Collaborator

okhat commented Mar 19, 2024

Thank you @mwildehahn , merged!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants