Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add III_D macro in math/base/napi/ternary #4855

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 23, 2025

Conversation

anandkaranubc
Copy link
Contributor

Resolves None.

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

  • adds STDLIB_MATH_BASE_NAPI_MODULE_III_D macro in math/base/napi/ternary

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request:

  • resolves None

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.


@stdlib-js/reviewers

---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: na
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: na
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: missing_dependencies
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---
---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: passed
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: na
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---

---
type: pre_push_report
description: Results of running various checks prior to pushing changes.
report:
  - task: run_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: run_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: run_cpp_examples
    status: na
  - task: run_javascript_readme_examples
    status: na
  - task: run_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_cpp_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_fortran_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_javascript_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_julia_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_python_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_r_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_javascript_tests
    status: na
---
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added Math Issue or pull request specific to math functionality. Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. labels Jan 23, 2025
@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor

stdlib-bot commented Jan 23, 2025

Coverage Report

Package Statements Branches Functions Lines
math/base/napi/ternary $\color{green}155/155$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}5/5$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}1/1$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}155/155$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

@anandkaranubc
Copy link
Contributor Author

anandkaranubc commented Jan 23, 2025

P.S. The refactoring looks great! My bad timing, haha, but at least I got to see both before and after.

@kgryte
Copy link
Member

kgryte commented Jan 23, 2025

The refactoring looks great!

Yeah, the previous organization (or lack thereof) was not going to scale.

@kgryte
Copy link
Member

kgryte commented Jan 23, 2025

@anandkaranubc You're missing one necessary change. You also need to update the manifest.json file.

Copy link
Member

@kgryte kgryte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Apart from updating the manifest.json file, this PR LGTM.

@kgryte kgryte added Feature Issue or pull request for adding a new feature. and removed Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. labels Jan 23, 2025
@anandkaranubc
Copy link
Contributor Author

@anandkaranubc You're missing one necessary change. You also need to update the manifest.json file.

Doing it rn! Thanks for the catch :)

---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: na
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: na
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---

---
type: pre_push_report
description: Results of running various checks prior to pushing changes.
report:
  - task: run_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: run_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: run_cpp_examples
    status: na
  - task: run_javascript_readme_examples
    status: na
  - task: run_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_cpp_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_fortran_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_javascript_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_julia_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_python_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_r_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_javascript_tests
    status: na
---
@kgryte
Copy link
Member

kgryte commented Jan 23, 2025

FYI: you can verify that everything works as expected by compiling the native add-on and running the unit tests. That would have caught the incorrect file name bug.

@kgryte kgryte changed the title feat: add STDLIB_MATH_BASE_NAPI_MODULE_III_D macro in math/base/napi/ternary feat: add III_D macro in math/base/napi/ternary Jan 23, 2025
@kgryte kgryte merged commit 39c7a0a into stdlib-js:develop Jan 23, 2025
11 checks passed
@anandkaranubc anandkaranubc deleted the napi/ternary-iii-d branch January 23, 2025 01:00
Vinit-Pandit pushed a commit to Vinit-Pandit/stdlibMine that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2025
PR-URL: stdlib-js#4855
Co-authored-by: Athan Reines <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Athan Reines <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Feature Issue or pull request for adding a new feature. Math Issue or pull request specific to math functionality.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants