Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: move CMAF HAM dependencies from lib to samples #120

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Oct 29, 2024

Conversation

littlespex
Copy link
Collaborator

see: #119

- update deps
- update rules
- reformat code base

Signed-off-by: Casey Occhialini <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Casey Occhialini <[email protected]>
see: #103
Signed-off-by: Casey Occhialini <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Casey Occhialini <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Casey Occhialini <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Casey Occhialini <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Casey Occhialini <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Casey Occhialini <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Casey Occhialini <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Casey Occhialini <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Casey Occhialini <[email protected]>
@littlespex littlespex requested review from a team as code owners October 29, 2024 04:58
Beraliv
Beraliv previously approved these changes Oct 29, 2024
Copy link

@Beraliv Beraliv left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Clear change, no questions so far

@littlespex littlespex changed the title fix: move CMAF HAS dependencies from lib to samples fix: move CMAF HAM dependencies from lib to samples Oct 29, 2024
Base automatically changed from issue/enum-to-const to main October 29, 2024 16:00
@littlespex littlespex dismissed Beraliv’s stale review October 29, 2024 16:00

The base branch was changed.

@littlespex littlespex merged commit 9a56ebb into main Oct 29, 2024
2 checks passed
@littlespex littlespex deleted the issue/119-ham-deps branch October 29, 2024 18:05
@nicolaslevy
Copy link
Contributor

Agree! with @Beraliv. I like the new way to use external parsers

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants