Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] Turbulent kinetic energy based on inlet condition for supersonic inlet #2430

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Cristopher-Morales
Copy link
Contributor

Proposed Changes

Allow use of turbulent market for supersonic inlet where turbulent kinetic energy is computed based on the turbulent intensity provided at the inlets

Related Work

Consistent with previous pull request #1843

PR Checklist

Put an X by all that apply. You can fill this out after submitting the PR. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask! We want to help. These are a guide for you to know what the reviewers will be looking for in your contribution.

  • I am submitting my contribution to the develop branch.
  • [X ] My contribution generates no new compiler warnings (try with --warnlevel=3 when using meson).
  • My contribution is commented and consistent with SU2 style (https://su2code.github.io/docs_v7/Style-Guide/).
  • I used the pre-commit hook to prevent dirty commits and used pre-commit run --all to format old commits.
  • I have added a test case that demonstrates my contribution, if necessary.
  • I have updated appropriate documentation (Tutorials, Docs Page, config_template.cpp), if necessary.

@Cristopher-Morales Cristopher-Morales changed the title Turbulent kinetic energy based on inlet condition for supersonic inlet [WIP] Turbulent kinetic energy based on inlet condition for supersonic inlet Jan 23, 2025
@rois1995
Copy link
Contributor

Can you try a case with supersonic inlet and check if the mach number is computed correctly at the inlet?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants