feat(ci): use github arm64 runners

[madonuko]

No description provided.

[june-fish]

Is the 'large' label already used by all packages that need it (i.e. zed, any others?). If so this LGTM.

[madonuko]

Is the 'large' label already used by all packages that need it (i.e. zed, any others?). If so this LGTM.

The assumption is that packages that don't use lg just never uses our builder in any way and instead have been using gh ones, meaning gh builders have the ability to build those pkgs.

Since the x64 builds are ok, then I think it's a reasonable assumption that the gh arm builders also have the same limitations and perfs.

Therefore there are no changes required on all packages.

[june-fish]

Sounds good to me.

[raboneko]

💔 All backports failed

Status	Branch	Result
❌	f40	An unhandled error occurred. Please see the logs for details
❌	f41	An unhandled error occurred. Please see the logs for details
❌	el10	Backport failed because of merge conflicts You might need to backport the following PRs to el10: - feat(ci): use github arm64 runners (#3031) - fix(ci): subrepo labels (#2894) - fix(ci): switch to ubuntu-22.04 (#2836) - add subrepo label (#2893) - feat(ci): add mock label to ci, also remove multilib (#2863) - feat(ci)!: switch to rpmbuild (#2792) - fix(ci/{build,json-build}): support the extra label in anda.hcl (#2731)

Manual backport

To create the backport manually run:

backport --pr 3156

Questions ?

Please refer to the Backport tool documentation and see the Github Action logs for details