Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add some facts about the parallel arrow category #461

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

4e554c4c
Copy link

@4e554c4c 4e554c4c commented Feb 7, 2025

Description

  • The walking parallel arrow category is self-dual (not sure if we have a better name for this)
  • A criterion for natural transformations of Forks

Checklist

Before submitting a merge request, please check the items below:

  • I've read the contributing guidelines.
  • The imports of new modules have been sorted with support/sort-imports.hs (or nix run --experimental-features nix-command -f . sort-imports).
  • All new code blocks have "agda" as their language.

If your change affects many files without adding substantial content, and
you don't want your name to appear on those pages (for example, treewide
refactorings or reformattings), start the commit message and PR title with chore:.

@4e554c4c 4e554c4c force-pushed the parallel branch 2 times, most recently from 70f9d79 to eca905d Compare February 7, 2025 15:29
@4e554c4c
Copy link
Author

4e554c4c commented Feb 7, 2025

ah wait some of my code was in a stash

@4e554c4c
Copy link
Author

4e554c4c commented Feb 7, 2025

ok sorry about that should be good now.

@Lavenza
Copy link
Member

Lavenza commented Feb 7, 2025

Pull request preview

@@ -70,12 +81,49 @@ parallel arrows between them. It is the shape of [[equaliser]] and
```
-->

The parallel category is isomorphic to its opposite through the involution `not : Bool Bool`.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
The parallel category is isomorphic to its opposite through the involution `not : Bool → Bool`.
The parallel category is isomorphic to its opposite through the involution `not`{.Agda}.

This makes a link and the type will appear on hover

```
-->

Paralell pairs of morphisms in a category $\cC$ are equivalent to functors from the
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
Paralell pairs of morphisms in a category $\cC$ are equivalent to functors from the
Parallel pairs of morphisms in a category $\cC$ are equivalent to functors from the

\arrow["v", from=1-5, to=2-5]
\arrow["{f'}", from=2-1, to=2-2]
\arrow["{g'}", from=2-4, to=2-5]
\end{tikzcd}.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
\end{tikzcd}.
\end{tikzcd}

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

so the 1lab is in the "equations implicitly end a sentence" camp? This is probably something that should be put in the contributing/style doc.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Comment on lines +145 to +146
$A \stackrel{\overset{f}{\longrightarrow}}{\underset{g}{\longrightarrow}} B$ and
$C \stackrel{\overset{f'}{\longrightarrow}}{\underset{g'}{\longrightarrow}} D$
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
$A \stackrel{\overset{f}{\longrightarrow}}{\underset{g}{\longrightarrow}} B$ and
$C \stackrel{\overset{f'}{\longrightarrow}}{\underset{g'}{\longrightarrow}} D$
$A\ \overset{f}{\underset{g}{\tto}}\ B$ and
$C\ \overset{f'}{\underset{g'}{\tto}}\ D$

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants