Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

CI ONLY #9521

Draft
wants to merge 10 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

CI ONLY #9521

wants to merge 10 commits into from

Conversation

marcinszkudlinski
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@marcinszkudlinski marcinszkudlinski force-pushed the test1 branch 5 times, most recently from 2110a40 to 37936d9 Compare October 18, 2024 09:43
@marcinszkudlinski
ipc: cosmetic name change status => state
813e39c 
module_source_status_count in fact counts
"state" field of all components.
Name changed to module_source_state_count

Signed-off-by: Marcin Szkudlinski <[email protected]>
@marcinszkudlinski
buf: split sink_list connector to 2 fields
8e25dc3 
comp_buffer::sink_list field used to have 2 meanings:
 - a list connector of all data receivers from the
module
 - a list connector for data receivers for extra
modules allocated when raw data processing is in use

This commit separate both cases by introducing 2 fields
in comp_buffer structure

The purpose is to make buffer connections independent from
comp_buffer

Signed-off-by: Marcin Szkudlinski <[email protected]>
@marcinszkudlinski
buf: remove unnecessary cache operation
483bd18 
All control structures of buffers shared between cores
are now stored in a non-cached memory alias.
Cache writeback_invalidate is no longer needed here

Signed-off-by: Marcin Szkudlinski <[email protected]>
@marcinszkudlinski
....
135ea06
@marcinszkudlinski
....
d5a0785
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@bardliao bardliao Awaiting requested review from bardliao bardliao will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review bardliao is a code owner

@pblaszko pblaszko Awaiting requested review from pblaszko pblaszko will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review pblaszko is a code owner

@ranj063 ranj063 Awaiting requested review from ranj063 ranj063 will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review ranj063 is a code owner

@jxstelter jxstelter Awaiting requested review from jxstelter jxstelter will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review jxstelter is a code owner

@singalsu singalsu Awaiting requested review from singalsu singalsu will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review singalsu is a code owner

@lgirdwood lgirdwood Awaiting requested review from lgirdwood lgirdwood will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review lgirdwood is a code owner

@plbossart plbossart Awaiting requested review from plbossart plbossart will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review plbossart is a code owner

@mmaka1 mmaka1 Awaiting requested review from mmaka1 mmaka1 will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review mmaka1 is a code owner

@lbetlej lbetlej Awaiting requested review from lbetlej lbetlej will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review lbetlej is a code owner

@dbaluta dbaluta Awaiting requested review from dbaluta dbaluta will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review dbaluta is a code owner

@kv2019i kv2019i Awaiting requested review from kv2019i kv2019i will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review kv2019i is a code owner

At least 2 approving reviews are required to merge this pull request.

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@marcinszkudlinski